2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2018.8451287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Local and Deep Features for Efficient Cell Image Classification Using Random Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we demonstrate the performance of our approach for classifying 12 CNT classes, defined later. We perform classification using 1000 trees RF classifier, which previously proved to be very efficient [41] [39]. During training and testing, we used 5 fold cross-validation, where 80% of data was used for training and the remaining 20% was used for testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we demonstrate the performance of our approach for classifying 12 CNT classes, defined later. We perform classification using 1000 trees RF classifier, which previously proved to be very efficient [41] [39]. During training and testing, we used 5 fold cross-validation, where 80% of data was used for training and the remaining 20% was used for testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF classifier with 1000 trees was tested before to classify Human Epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) images and it was very successful in recognizing six and seven classes of cells and specimen samples respectively [39] [41]. Hence, the RF classifier was selected to classify CNT forest images that yields impressive results as shown in Table II, when adopting the RF with many trees to aide the voting process within the classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Oraibi et al [26] used the known CNN VGG-19 to extract features and combine them with local features such as RIC-LBP (rotation invariant co-occurrence local binary pattern) and JML (joint motif labels) for an efficient cell classification. The combination of features was used to train a random forest classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local feature extractors, individually and in combination, followed by random forest classifier were employed to create the class predictor model. We used four local descriptors that are derived from both Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and Motif Cooccurrence Matrix (MCM) descriptors [150][151][152] The reason behind using multiple local descriptors is to capture more texture features and to ultimately improve the final classification accuracy.…”
Section: Exploration Of Carbon Nanotube Forest Synthesis-structure Relationships Using Physics-based Simulation and Machine Learning (Hanmentioning
confidence: 99%