2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning local binary patterns for gender classification on real-world face images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
224
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
224
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes, simple features are pooled together as in (Kumar et al (2009)), where image intensities in RGB and HSV color spaces, edge magnitudes, and gradient directions were combined. More elaborated features include Haar-like wavelets (Shakhnarovich et al (2002)), Local Binary Patterns (LBPs) (Shan (2012)) or Gabor wavelets (Leng and Wang (2008)). These features work well and are robust to small illumination and geometric transformations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sometimes, simple features are pooled together as in (Kumar et al (2009)), where image intensities in RGB and HSV color spaces, edge magnitudes, and gradient directions were combined. More elaborated features include Haar-like wavelets (Shakhnarovich et al (2002)), Local Binary Patterns (LBPs) (Shan (2012)) or Gabor wavelets (Leng and Wang (2008)). These features work well and are robust to small illumination and geometric transformations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the AdaBoost and the SVM algorithms have been widely used in the literature (Baluja and Rowley (2007); Shan (2012); Eidinger et al (2014)). In this spirit, an excellent comparison of gender recognition techniques using different methods can be found in Dago-Casas et al (2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protocol Accuracy [19] LFW Subset 7443/13233 94.81% [20] LFW Subset 7443/13233 98.01% [7] LFW BEFIT protocol 97.23% [7] GROUPS Subset 15579/28231 84.55 − 86.61% [12] GROUPS Subset 22778/28231 86.4% [5] MORPH Subset 88% [17] MORPH Subset 97.1%…”
Section: Reference Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common features include Haar-like [10], HOG, LBP, edgelet, CSS, Covariance, and Integral channel [11]. HOG feature can reflect the appearance and contour of the target object, thus it is widely used in pedestrian detection [12,13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%