2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2018.2875512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Multi-View Representation With LSTM for 3-D Shape Recognition and Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is challenging for 3D convolutional neural networks to process very large point clouds and this approach is constrained by the representation power of the feature extraction of 3D target objects. Hence, the strategy of multi-view CNNS [55] was adopted here to render the 3D point clouds of trees into 2D images and then apply 2D convolution nets to classify them. The 2D CNN method is relatively mature and has achieved state-of-the-art performance in some image-based phenotyping tasks, with successful application in tasks such as face recognition [56], crop attribute identification [31] and video-based target tracking [57].…”
Section: Potential Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging for 3D convolutional neural networks to process very large point clouds and this approach is constrained by the representation power of the feature extraction of 3D target objects. Hence, the strategy of multi-view CNNS [55] was adopted here to render the 3D point clouds of trees into 2D images and then apply 2D convolution nets to classify them. The 2D CNN method is relatively mature and has achieved state-of-the-art performance in some image-based phenotyping tasks, with successful application in tasks such as face recognition [56], crop attribute identification [31] and video-based target tracking [57].…”
Section: Potential Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason may be that LSTM has stable performance in terms of gradient disappearance and dependence, as well as its good applicability in the sequence [23]. Thus, it is more suitable for the prediction and evaluation of road traffic safety risks.…”
Section: Figure 6 Comparison Of Rnn and Lstm Assessment Results Of Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GPCNN, a hierarchical view-group-shape architecture is proposed, and then all group level descriptors are weighted embedded to generate the shape level descriptor. • CNN+LSTM ( [42]). In CNN+LSTM, the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are combined with long shortterm memory (LSTM) to exploit the correlative information from multiple views.…”
Section: Competing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training/testing split setting in ( [40], [30]) is employed. In our experiments, some popular descriptors that are often used in 3D shape retrieval, [42]). The default parameters setting of these methods is used.…”
Section: G Performance Evaluation On Modelnet40 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%