2017
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2017.2694224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Multilayer Channel Features for Pedestrian Detection

Abstract: Pedestrian detection based on the combination of convolutional neural network (CNN) and traditional handcrafted features (i.e., HOG+LUV) has achieved great success. In general, HOG+LUV are used to generate the candidate proposals and then CNN classifies these proposals. Despite its success, there is still room for improvement. For example, CNN classifies these proposals by the fully connected layer features, while proposal scores and the features in the inner-layers of CNN are ignored. In this paper, we propos… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of the results are much better than the previous methods which combine handcrafted features and CNN features, e.g. CompACT [39] and MCF [40]. Our approach reaches the same results as previous RPN+BF [28] on the original Caltech dataset, and gets a better result of 6.41% over its 7.3% on Caltech dataset with the improved annotations.…”
Section: Evaluation With Respective To Occlusion and Scalesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Both of the results are much better than the previous methods which combine handcrafted features and CNN features, e.g. CompACT [39] and MCF [40]. Our approach reaches the same results as previous RPN+BF [28] on the original Caltech dataset, and gets a better result of 6.41% over its 7.3% on Caltech dataset with the improved annotations.…”
Section: Evaluation With Respective To Occlusion and Scalesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…VGG16 [14] was applied to extract features, and a cascade AdaBoost classifier was trained based on these features [15,16]. Their good performance testified that CNNs have a strong power of extracting general and representative features without the need of human interference.…”
Section: Deep Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, MGAN is compared to the following recent stateof-art methods: CompACT-Deep [3], DeepParts [28], MS-CNN [2], RPN+BF [30], SA-F.RCNN [12], MCF [4], SDS-RCNN [1], F.RCNN [31], F.RCNN+ATT-vbb [33], GDFL [13], and Bi-Box [36]. Tab.…”
Section: Caltech Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%