2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/dyspan.2010.5457857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Multiuser Channel Allocations in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Formulation

Abstract: Abstract-We consider the following fundamental problem in the context of channelized dynamic spectrum access. There are M secondary users and N ≥ M orthogonal channels. Each secondary user requires a single channel for operation that does not conflict with the channels assigned to the other users. Due to geographic dispersion, each secondary user can potentially see different primary user occupancy behavior on each channel. Time is divided into discrete decision rounds. The throughput obtainable from spectrum … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
144
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to learning the channel availability, the second users also learn the other users' strategies and the number of total users in the system through channel feedback. Existing work applying MAB in the cognitive radio context assumes identical channel view with the exception of Gai et al [23]. However, the model considered in this work, in fact makes the implicit assumption that all secondary users are colocated ("if there are multiple users on the channel, then we assume that, due to interference, at most one of the conflicting users gets reward").…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to learning the channel availability, the second users also learn the other users' strategies and the number of total users in the system through channel feedback. Existing work applying MAB in the cognitive radio context assumes identical channel view with the exception of Gai et al [23]. However, the model considered in this work, in fact makes the implicit assumption that all secondary users are colocated ("if there are multiple users on the channel, then we assume that, due to interference, at most one of the conflicting users gets reward").…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the model considered in this work, in fact makes the implicit assumption that all secondary users are colocated ("if there are multiple users on the channel, then we assume that, due to interference, at most one of the conflicting users gets reward"). Since co-located secondary users likely observe identical primary user activities, a contradiction arises to the claim of "allowing the reward process on the same channel to be different" [23]. In our earlier work [24], we proposed two order-optimal policies for the channel assignment problem without switching costs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And we focus on the simplest complete-interference case when all secondary users interfere with each other and must therefore each be allocated distinct channels. The same assumption is also adopted in [7] and [20], and is discussed in [23]. We use a M × N matrix P I to denote the primary free probabilities where its element P m,i is the primary free probability of channel i for user m, and P m,i is uncorrelated with P l,i for m = l; and a M × N matrix R to denote the channel achievable rates where its element R m,i is the achievable rate of channel i for user m, and R m,i is uncorrelated with R l,i for m = l. We assume that P I and R are known to the users a priori, the estimation of them is not our concern.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The optimal sensing order setting problem is formulated under the multi-armed bandit framework in [5][6][7], where a balance is found between longterm channel exploration and short-term channel exploitation to optimize the total throughput throughout the entire transmission of the SUs. However in this paper we focus on exploiting the instantaneous channel condition under the assumption that the statistics of channel availability and channel achievable rate are known a priori.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation