2022
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning new meanings for known L2 words: Long‐term semantic representation is updated to integrate new information after consolidation

Abstract: Previous research about learning new meanings for known words in second language (L2) has found that semantic relatedness, i.e., congruency, between new

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Target words Intersection (32), Ramps (21), Pedestrian (40), Roundabout (29), Lane (33), Curve (19), Hubs (31), Brake (48), Flash (37), accident (32).…”
Section: Words Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Target words Intersection (32), Ramps (21), Pedestrian (40), Roundabout (29), Lane (33), Curve (19), Hubs (31), Brake (48), Flash (37), accident (32).…”
Section: Words Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning lexical acquisition, academics have distinguished between lexical configuration and lexical engagement. The former refers to the rapid acquisition of explicit vocabulary knowledge, while the latter refers to a slower process of interaction and fusion between newly learned words and existing words in the mental lexicon [29,40]. According to the interpretation of the complementary learning systems (CLS) proposed by Davis and Gaskell (2009), initial exposure to a new word will only lead to sparse representations in the short-term hippocampal system, consolidated to enhance long-term memory representations in neocortical memory [41,42].…”
Section: Effects Of Offline Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study examines the effectiveness of a common approach to dealing with eyeblinks and other artifacts that produce extreme values, in which artifacts with stable scalp distributions are corrected using independent component analysis (ICA; Chaumon et al, 2015;Jung, Makeig, Humphries, et al, 2000;Jung, Makeig, Westerfield, et al, 2000) and any trials that have extreme voltage deflections in any channel in the corrected data are also excluded from the averaged ERPs (artifact rejection; Islam et al, 2016;Nolan et al, 2010). This general approach is used very widely: in the first 10 issues of the 2023 volume of Psychophysiology, there were at least 18 papers that used some variant of this general approach (see Addante et al, 2023;Arnau et al, 2023;Bruchmann et al, 2023;Chen & Chen, 2023;Fan et al, 2023;Hubbard et al, 2023;Lin et al, 2023;Liu et al, 2023;Morales et al, 2023;Nguyen et al, 2023;Nicolaisen-Sobesky et al, 2023;Paraskevoudi & SanMiguel, 2023;Ringer et al, 2023;Schmuck et al, 2023;Sun et al, 2023;Tao et al, 2023;Wood et al, 2023;Zheng et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%