2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Nonlinear State-Space Models Using Smooth Particle-Filter-Based Likelihood Approximations

Abstract: When classical particle filtering algorithms are used for maximum likelihood parameter estimation in nonlinear statespace models, a key challenge is that estimates of the likelihood function and its derivatives are inherently noisy. The key idea in this paper is to run a particle filter based on a current parameter estimate, but then use the output from this particle filter to re-evaluate the likelihood function approximation also for other parameter values. This results in a (local) deterministic approximatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in [32], the main challenge is that likelihood distribution estimation and its derivatives are fundamentally noisy; the main idea of the SPF method is to choose the proposal distributionq(xki|xk1i,zk)and the resampling weights wkn, such that it is entirely independent of parameters θ (in this application, the parameters of the degradation model). Based on this choice, it is noted that all the randomly extracted elements, such as particles x0:Tn and ancestor indices a1:Tn (furthermore are the a1:Tndrawn with respect to the wkn) in the PF algorithm, became independent of θ; this is critical in the analysis and estimation of battery degradation as the true values of the degradation model parameters are unknown, and highly influenced by uncertainty [24].…”
Section: Theoretical Background‐methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As presented in [32], the main challenge is that likelihood distribution estimation and its derivatives are fundamentally noisy; the main idea of the SPF method is to choose the proposal distributionq(xki|xk1i,zk)and the resampling weights wkn, such that it is entirely independent of parameters θ (in this application, the parameters of the degradation model). Based on this choice, it is noted that all the randomly extracted elements, such as particles x0:Tn and ancestor indices a1:Tn (furthermore are the a1:Tndrawn with respect to the wkn) in the PF algorithm, became independent of θ; this is critical in the analysis and estimation of battery degradation as the true values of the degradation model parameters are unknown, and highly influenced by uncertainty [24].…”
Section: Theoretical Background‐methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this choice, it is noted that all the randomly extracted elements, such as particles x0:Tn and ancestor indices a1:Tn (furthermore are the a1:Tndrawn with respect to the wkn) in the PF algorithm, became independent of θ; this is critical in the analysis and estimation of battery degradation as the true values of the degradation model parameters are unknown, and highly influenced by uncertainty [24]. Therefore, this article combines the second‐order empirical degradation model with the SPF algorithm [32] to improve the RUL prediction of LiB battery by smoothing the PF using likelihood approximations scheme.…”
Section: Theoretical Background‐methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations