2006
DOI: 10.28945/3009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Objects: Adaptive Retrieval through Learning Styles

Abstract: Nowadays, the amount of information grows in an exponential way, mainly because of technological advances in media. This scenario claims for the development of different skills in order to increase learning abilities, making them personal and customizable. Such factor is significant in a changing society, which implies in a range of mechanisms which would allow to identify, in a non-intrusive way, which learning style some specific student would prefer to perform in order to build knowledge from some learning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been metadata standards for learning objects, such as those proposed by Dublin Core (DC, 2009), IEEE LTSC (IEEE LTSC, 2009), and IMS Guide (IMS, 2006, which is similar to library catalogue systems. However, to effectively use learning objects to support teaching and learning for a specific field, domain knowledge must be applied to manage the learning objects (Harman & Koohang, 2005;Koohang, 2004;Mustaro & Silveira, 2006). This has lead to approaches to Semantic Web applications that model the relationships between learning objects using formal ontologies (Sicilia & Lytras, 2005).…”
Section: E-portfolio Artifacts Are Learning Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been metadata standards for learning objects, such as those proposed by Dublin Core (DC, 2009), IEEE LTSC (IEEE LTSC, 2009), and IMS Guide (IMS, 2006, which is similar to library catalogue systems. However, to effectively use learning objects to support teaching and learning for a specific field, domain knowledge must be applied to manage the learning objects (Harman & Koohang, 2005;Koohang, 2004;Mustaro & Silveira, 2006). This has lead to approaches to Semantic Web applications that model the relationships between learning objects using formal ontologies (Sicilia & Lytras, 2005).…”
Section: E-portfolio Artifacts Are Learning Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods for capturing learning styles and using that information to drive learning object selection have been proposed (García, Amandi, Schiaffino, & Campo, 2007;García-Valdez et al, 2007;Kaur et al, 2005;Mustaro & Silviera, 2006;Santally & Senteni, 2005;Wolf, 2002). Whether the learning style is discerned from analyzing responses to a questionnaire, like the 118-question survey proposed by Wolf (2002) in the iWeaver project, or if it is detected in real-time during the course of instruction by providing alternative content models to be rated by the learner and corroborated by learner responses, the relevant information from which the Styler will base its placement decisions comes from the Learner module.…”
Section: Figure 3 -The Style R Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might also be able to provide alternate content depending the competence profile it has established, or indeed different media formats of LOs depending of student preferences. These notions are closely linked to research of adaptive LMSs based on learning styles (Mustaro, 2006).…”
Section: Implications For Learning Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%