2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco.2019.8903046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning of Image Dehazing Models for Segmentation Tasks

Abstract: To evaluate their performance, existing dehazing approaches generally rely on distance measures between the generated image and its corresponding ground truth. Despite its ability to produce visually good images, using pixel-based or even perceptual metrics does not guarantee, in general, that the produced image is fit for being used as input for low-level computer vision tasks such as segmentation. To overcome this weakness, we are proposing a novel end-to-end approach for image dehazing, fit for being used a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the RGB-only baseline, relative improvements of 3.6% and 3.4% on PSNR and SSIM respectively are observed when using Input Dropout on RGB+D, and 4.5% PSNR and 2.2% SSIM for RGB+S. We also compare our method to competing techniques, such as "Dehazing for segmentation" (D4S) [5] which proposes an approach to dehaze to increase performance for a subsequent task using a modality only available during training, and Pix2Pix GAN [3] which employs an extra generator to generate the missing modality from the RGB image. In every case, Input Dropout performs better while being simpler than the other approaches.…”
Section: Input Dropout For Image Dehazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the RGB-only baseline, relative improvements of 3.6% and 3.4% on PSNR and SSIM respectively are observed when using Input Dropout on RGB+D, and 4.5% PSNR and 2.2% SSIM for RGB+S. We also compare our method to competing techniques, such as "Dehazing for segmentation" (D4S) [5] which proposes an approach to dehaze to increase performance for a subsequent task using a modality only available during training, and Pix2Pix GAN [3] which employs an extra generator to generate the missing modality from the RGB image. In every case, Input Dropout performs better while being simpler than the other approaches.…”
Section: Input Dropout For Image Dehazingmentioning
confidence: 99%