2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning orientations: Diversity in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicated that age has little impact on competence ratings; stage of degree possibly a better indicator of student progress as cohorts entering higher education become increasingly diverse (Jeffrey 2009). Finally, with Accounting and Finance as the base major, there was only a significant impact for Economics students on the composite competence scores.…”
Section: Interestingly Goldfinch and Hughes' (2007) Study Of Scottismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated that age has little impact on competence ratings; stage of degree possibly a better indicator of student progress as cohorts entering higher education become increasingly diverse (Jeffrey 2009). Finally, with Accounting and Finance as the base major, there was only a significant impact for Economics students on the composite competence scores.…”
Section: Interestingly Goldfinch and Hughes' (2007) Study Of Scottismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of cognitive dissonance follows a basic tenet of learning theory, namely that learning results from exposing students to situations that challenge their cognitive framework, but not so much that they become demotivated. Avoiding excessive mismatches has usually entailed identifying learner characteristics and matching them with a teaching strategy that accommodates or enhances the student characteristic (Jeffrey 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some learning theories suggest that students' motives largely determine how they engage in learning activities. Intrinsically motivated students will invest high levels of cognitive effort without consideration for any associated rewards, whereas extrinsically motivated students may be attracted to participate by getting good grades, but their engagement may be instrumental and surface (Jeffrey 2009). Mulryan (1992) found that in traditional small group learning discouraged students, unrecognised students, despondent students, unmotivated students, bored students, intellectual snobs, and especially low achievers, manifested passivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%