2006
DOI: 10.3166/ria.20.775-804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Recursive Automata from Positive Examples

Isabelle Tellier

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In this theoretical paper, we compare the "classical" learning techniques used to infer regular grammars from positive examples with the ones used to infer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the concept of a cinnamon is an elaborated, filled with flesh version of an introduced much earlier but not so widely used skeletal notion -the notion of a recursive automaton / recursive finite-state automaton / recursive transition network / recursive control graph [3,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. It is a computation model equivalent in computational power to nondeterministic push-down automata.…”
Section: S Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning that the concept of a cinnamon is an elaborated, filled with flesh version of an introduced much earlier but not so widely used skeletal notion -the notion of a recursive automaton / recursive finite-state automaton / recursive transition network / recursive control graph [3,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. It is a computation model equivalent in computational power to nondeterministic push-down automata.…”
Section: S Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• User has very powerful control tools -control states and system options -in order to direct and control the CN traversal [24,25]. In particular, that allows simple 'visual' implementation of o heuristic algorithms [4,5,28] o nondeterministic algorithms [29] o randomized algorithms [30] • The programmer can define the solution scope, that is, how many solutions will be found (if they exist) -a single solution, a fixed in advance number of solutions, all solutions, prompting after each solution if another solution should be sought.…”
Section: Full Cnp Vs Cinnamon Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that the concept of a cinnamon is an elaborated, filled with flesh version of an introduced much earlier but not so widely used skeletal notionthe notion of a recursive automaton / recursive finite-state automaton / recursive transition network / recursive control graph [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. It is a computation model equivalent in computational power to nondeterministic push-down automata.…”
Section: Figure 2 Indicating Order Of Arrowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• User has very powerful control tools -control states and system options -in order to direct and control the CN traversal [24,25]. In particular, that allows simple 'visual' implementation of o heuristic algorithms [4,5,28] o nondeterministic algorithms [29] o randomized algorithms [30] • The programmer can define the solution scope, that is, how many solutions will be found (if they exist) -a single solution, a fixed in advance number of solutions, all solutions, prompting after each solution if another solution should be sought.…”
Section: Full Cnp Vs Cinnamon Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that the concept of a cinnamon is an elaborated, filled with flesh version of an introduced much earlier but not so widely used skeletal notion -the notion of a recursive automaton / recursive finite-state automaton / recursive transition network / recursive control graph [3,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. It is a computation model equivalent in computational power to nondeterministic push-down automata.…”
Section: Graphical Symbol L Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%