2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-016-5552-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning rules for multi-label classification: a stacking and a separate-and-conquer approach

Abstract: Dependencies between the labels are commonly regarded as the crucial issue in multi-label classification. Rules provide a natural way for symbolically describing such relationships. For instance, rules with label tests in the body allow for representing directed dependencies like implications, subsumptions, or exclusions. Moreover, rules naturally allow to jointly capture both local and global label dependencies. In this paper, we introduce two approaches for learning such label-dependent rules. Our first solu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies will further explore labels' dependencies (Loza Mencía & Janssen, 2016;Papagiannopoulou, Tsoumakas, & Tsamardinos, 2015), particularly, by using Bayesian networks to model it beforehand (Wang, Wang, Wang, & Ji, 2014) and also through specific recommender algorithms like those based on collaborative filtering (Adomavicius & Tuzhilin, 2005). Additionally, the authors plan to further investigate the prediction of labels' problems and assess the proposed ESL strategy in other MLC domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies will further explore labels' dependencies (Loza Mencía & Janssen, 2016;Papagiannopoulou, Tsoumakas, & Tsamardinos, 2015), particularly, by using Bayesian networks to model it beforehand (Wang, Wang, Wang, & Ji, 2014) and also through specific recommender algorithms like those based on collaborative filtering (Adomavicius & Tuzhilin, 2005). Additionally, the authors plan to further investigate the prediction of labels' problems and assess the proposed ESL strategy in other MLC domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a separate-and-conquer strategy the step of inducing descriptive but often redundant models of the data is omitted. Instead, classification rules that aimed at providing accurate predictions are learned directly [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there are algorithms that adopt the separate-and-conquer strategy used by many traditional rule learners for binary or multi-class classification, e.g. by Ripper [7], and transfer it to MLC [20,22]. Whereas in descriptive rule learning one does usually not aim at discovering rules that minimize a certain (multi-label) loss, the latter approaches employ a heuristic-guided search for rules that optimize a given rule learning heuristic and hence could benefit from the results of this work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%