2009
DOI: 10.3390/fi1010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Space Mashups: Combining Web 2.0 Tools to Create Collaborative and Reflective Learning Spaces

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, Web 2.0 open content mashups or combinations are explored. Two case studies of recent initial teacher training programmes are reviewed where blogs and wikis were blended to create new virtual learning spaces. In two separate studies, students offer their views about using these tools, and reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. There is also discussion about aggregation of content and a theorization of how community and personal spaces can create tension and conflict. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
43
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Laru, Näykki and Järvelä (2012) discuss a number of studies that demonstrate the benefits of blogs (Churchill, 2009;Ellison & Wu, 2008;Yang, 2009;Halic, Lee, Paulus & Spence, 2010;Wheeler, 2009, Hemmi, Bayne & Land, 2009Xie & Sharma, 2008), wikis (Cress & Kimmerle, 2008;Wheeler;Hemmi, Bayne & Land, 2009) and social networks (Arnold & Paulus, 2010). However, like Meyer (2010), they also highlight the lack of empirical studies into the impact of Web 2.0 in higher education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Laru, Näykki and Järvelä (2012) discuss a number of studies that demonstrate the benefits of blogs (Churchill, 2009;Ellison & Wu, 2008;Yang, 2009;Halic, Lee, Paulus & Spence, 2010;Wheeler, 2009, Hemmi, Bayne & Land, 2009Xie & Sharma, 2008), wikis (Cress & Kimmerle, 2008;Wheeler;Hemmi, Bayne & Land, 2009) and social networks (Arnold & Paulus, 2010). However, like Meyer (2010), they also highlight the lack of empirical studies into the impact of Web 2.0 in higher education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These media have been highlighted for their potential to be used in the teaching-learning process within higher education (Brown, 2012;Wheeler, 2009;Ajjan & Hartshorne, 2008;Churchill, 2009;Ellison & Wu, 2008;Top, Yukselturk & Inan, 2010;Çağlar & Demirok, 2010). Nowadays, university students spend part of their time making use of Web 2.0 tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such pedagogical opportunities have been largely emphasized in the context of wikis (Cress & Kimmerle, 2008;Wheeler, 2009). Wikis provide new and simple ways for a web-based collaboration and authoring and have been used as e-learning environments in schools and higher education (Leuf & Cunningham, 2001;Bruns & Humphreys, 2005;Richardson, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected the blog tool to support this function, and it was noticeable that several groups decided to take the blog idea, but to create and host 'their' group blog on one of the many free external tools, such as pbwiki, blogger or wordpress. Students comfort in carving out a shared and personal learning space for their teams to operate within shows how far students have moved from the tensions outlined by Wheeler [25].…”
Section: The Re-design: Using a Student Centred Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%