2024
DOI: 10.1109/tlt.2024.3358864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Style Identification Using Semisupervised Self-Taught Labeling

Hani Y. Ayyoub,
Omar S. Al-Kadi
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other models, like the "Robust Fuzzy C-Means algorithm (RFCM)" [77], "Category Boosting (Catboost)", and "Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) [78]", show commendable accuracies, all above 92%, but they are not quite as precise as the proposed model. Models with lower accuracies, like the "K-modes Naive Bayes Learning Styles (KM-NB-LS)" [79], "Adaptive Fuzzy C-Mean model (AFCM)" [80], and "Self-Taught Semi-Supervised Learning (ST-SSL)" [81], hover around 88-89%, which might suggest a less sensitive approach to the subtleties of learning styles. In the bar chart for sentiment analysis of learner feedback shown in Figure 16, the proposed model's top performance is consistent, registering an accuracy of 93.81%.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other models, like the "Robust Fuzzy C-Means algorithm (RFCM)" [77], "Category Boosting (Catboost)", and "Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) [78]", show commendable accuracies, all above 92%, but they are not quite as precise as the proposed model. Models with lower accuracies, like the "K-modes Naive Bayes Learning Styles (KM-NB-LS)" [79], "Adaptive Fuzzy C-Mean model (AFCM)" [80], and "Self-Taught Semi-Supervised Learning (ST-SSL)" [81], hover around 88-89%, which might suggest a less sensitive approach to the subtleties of learning styles. In the bar chart for sentiment analysis of learner feedback shown in Figure 16, the proposed model's top performance is consistent, registering an accuracy of 93.81%.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%