2022
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3135928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Submodular Objectives for Team Environmental Monitoring

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work should also consider HRI frameworks that help users to select the policy that best fits their preferences. One approach could be choice-based learning where the user iteratively chooses between two presented options [5], [19], [54], [55]. Adapting this to MO-MRPD should explore how the variance of MRPD policies affect human choices, i.e., how humans can choose between different policies when their cost distributions are similar.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Future work should also consider HRI frameworks that help users to select the policy that best fits their preferences. One approach could be choice-based learning where the user iteratively chooses between two presented options [5], [19], [54], [55]. Adapting this to MO-MRPD should explore how the variance of MRPD policies affect human choices, i.e., how humans can choose between different policies when their cost distributions are similar.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many robotic planning problems face the challenge of being required to simultaneously optimize multiple objectives, for instance in path and trajectory planning [5], [8], [10], autonomous driving [11]- [14] transportation and mobility on demand [3], multi-robot planning [15]- [19].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this work, we propose a method to compute a finite set of weights Ω ⊂ W that will, for any w * ∈ W, allow us to approximate u(w * ) with u(w ) for an appropriately chosen w ∈ Ω. To evaluate the quality of a candidate set Ω, we use the notion of regret from [11,26], defined formally here: Definition 1 (Regret). Given two weights w , w * ∈ W, the regret of w under w * is defined as…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%