2021
DOI: 10.1088/0256-307x/38/9/097502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning the Effective Spin Hamiltonian of a Quantum Magnet

Abstract: To understand the intriguing many-body states and effects in the correlated quantum materials, inference of the microscopic effective Hamiltonian from experiments constitutes an important yet very challenging inverse problem. Here we propose an unbiased and efficient approach learning the effective Hamiltonian through the many-body analysis of the measured thermal data. Our approach combines the strategies including the automatic gradient and Bayesian optimization with the thermodynamics many-body solvers incl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each trial parameter set, we compute the same thermodynamic quantities from the model by using the XTRG solver [33,40]. We search for the parameter set that minimizes the total loss function through an unbiased and efficient Bayesian optimization process [31]. See Methods for more details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For each trial parameter set, we compute the same thermodynamic quantities from the model by using the XTRG solver [33,40]. We search for the parameter set that minimizes the total loss function through an unbiased and efficient Bayesian optimization process [31]. See Methods for more details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The index α labels different physical quantities, e.g., magnetic specific heat and susceptibilities, and N α counts the number of data points in O α . The optimization of L over the parameter space spanned by {J xy , J z , J PD , J Γ } is conducted via the Bayesian optimization [31]. The Landé factor g ab,c and the Van Vleck paramagnetic susceptibilities χ vv ab,c are optimized via the Nelder-Mead algorithm for each fixing {J xy , J z , J PD , J Γ }.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A difficult step in the quantification of models has been inversion from measured data to a model-the so-called inverse scattering problem, which is usually ill-posed due to loss of phase information. In this regard, machine learning (ML) [74,75] has shown promising results [76][77][78][79][80]. Here we combine ML approaches with large-scale semi-classical simulations (SCSs) [80].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%