2006
DOI: 10.1080/00220270500508810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning the language of school history: the role of linguistics in mapping the writing demands of the secondary school curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
54
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…To support students' language development within and across the years, there needs to be a systematic approach in identifying and planning the language objectives to ensure opportunities for progression. Systemic functional linguistics (SFL), based on Halliday's (2004aHalliday's ( , 2004b) work on how language makes meaning, has been recognized as a possible effective resource to support this planning (Christie & Derewianka, 2008;Coffin, 2006;Lightbown, 2014;Llinares, Morton, & Whittaker, 2012;Schleppegrell & de Oliveira, 2006). Schleppegrell and de Oliveira (2006) found that teachers without a language teaching background could be helped to use SFL to analyze the content of texts, which is a way to identify the language of the content from which language objectives are derived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support students' language development within and across the years, there needs to be a systematic approach in identifying and planning the language objectives to ensure opportunities for progression. Systemic functional linguistics (SFL), based on Halliday's (2004aHalliday's ( , 2004b) work on how language makes meaning, has been recognized as a possible effective resource to support this planning (Christie & Derewianka, 2008;Coffin, 2006;Lightbown, 2014;Llinares, Morton, & Whittaker, 2012;Schleppegrell & de Oliveira, 2006). Schleppegrell and de Oliveira (2006) found that teachers without a language teaching background could be helped to use SFL to analyze the content of texts, which is a way to identify the language of the content from which language objectives are derived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, researchers have applied SFL methods of discourse analysis to students and teachers' writing in history (Coffin, 2006a;2006b) as well as school history textbooks (Achugar & Schleppegrell, 2005;Coffin, 2003;Orteiza, 2003). As a language-based pedagogy, SFL and a focus on metalanguage has been proven to help students, particularly English Learners and Language Minority students, develop academic language and make meaning from written JUDGEMENT is a system that serves to appraise hu- Table 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This body of research is based on the premise that language description derived from detailed linguistic analysis in specific educational contexts provides teachers with important insights into the role of language in learning. Research studies show that through sharing knowledge about language form and function, and through modelling effective language use, teachers can help students to critically analyse texts as well as independently construct their own meanings (Coffin, 2006b, Donohue, 2002. In the paper by Coffin et al, the linguistic analysis expands the 'argument genre' framework devised originally for essays and adapts it for the analysis of text based conferencing.…”
Section: Methodologies For Exploring Language and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%