2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1047759400004384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to consume: consumption and consumerism in the Roman Empire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…112. Naerebout (2006/7); Greene (2008). The observations and remarks on globalisation as an anachronistic concept for the Roman world in also fall within this category.…”
Section: For This Text (And Its Contextual Understanding) See Sommer mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…112. Naerebout (2006/7); Greene (2008). The observations and remarks on globalisation as an anachronistic concept for the Roman world in also fall within this category.…”
Section: For This Text (And Its Contextual Understanding) See Sommer mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although notably, Greene (2008) argued for the existence of Roman consumerism. Greene (2008, 66) sees consumption simply as a means of fulfilling biological needs, with consumerism occurring on a larger scale driven by culturally determined desires.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critique has been raised to apply globalization to the ancient Roman world, addressing the anachronistic approach (Dench 2005), the argument that the Roman world was not a global empire (Naerebout 2006(Naerebout -2007Greene 2008), and that this framework offers no new insights or is even a mere fashionable substitute buzz-word for Romanization (Mattingly 2004). questions whether globalization might even serves to legitimize current inequalities, as it may be used as a gloss for neo-colonialism.…”
Section: Beyond the Romanization Paradigm? Glocalization And The Romamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some clearly side with the former, while others are willing to push the start back to the nineteenth or even sixteenth century, and others still go back to modern man's early beginnings. Applying theories of globalisation to the Roman world is therefore not the most controversial use of these ideasseveral scholars have recently weighed the merits of this approach (Witcher 2000;Hingley 2003Hingley , 2005Morley 2007: 90-102;Greene 2008;Pitts 2008), and justifiably so. The Roman economy was very advanced for a pre-industrial society.…”
Section: Globalisation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet he spends very little time on material culture -although he does briefly explore iron goods. Likewise, Greene's (2008) consumption article focuses on applied art, bead necklaces, pottery and lamps, yet calls for more studies to be carried out in order to determine whether Roman consumption practices can be labelled as 'consumerism'. Importantly, he later recognizes the potential for metalwork as a way to assess how surplus in production could be converted into non-essential goods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%