Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2023
DOI: 10.1145/3580305.3599859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Discover Various Simpson's Paradoxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It serves as a cautionary tale in the interpretation of statistical data, emphasizing the importance of considering confounding variables and the dangers of drawing conclusions based solely on aggregate data [9]. Over the years, the paradox has been examined from multiple perspectives, including its mathematical underpinnings, its impact on public policy, and its ethical implications [10,11]. The paradox has also been studied in the context of machine learning and data science, where it poses challenges in the interpretation of complex, multidimensional data [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It serves as a cautionary tale in the interpretation of statistical data, emphasizing the importance of considering confounding variables and the dangers of drawing conclusions based solely on aggregate data [9]. Over the years, the paradox has been examined from multiple perspectives, including its mathematical underpinnings, its impact on public policy, and its ethical implications [10,11]. The paradox has also been studied in the context of machine learning and data science, where it poses challenges in the interpretation of complex, multidimensional data [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economists have also encountered the paradox when analyzing GDP and per capita GDP growths, leading to potentially misleading conclusions about economic progress [14]. Latest progress in the domain has centered on pinpointing the factors that can result in deceptive epidemiological and statistical findings because of the paradox [10]. Scholars have suggested models and loss functions for assessing the correlation between two variables within various subgroups, offering a more detailed comprehension of the paradox.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%