2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09891-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to interact and interacting to learn: a substantive theory of clinical workplace learning for diverse cohorts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To name a few recent examples, specifically in terms of clinical identities, Grounded Theory has been demonstrated to produce high quality findings on how nursing staff reconcile their identities as specialist practitioners, teachers, and Nurses [15,16], and in global studies, how clinicians learn [17], navigate their working environments [18][19][20], and negotiate their careerrelated errors and regrets [21][22][23][24]. It is with this reasoning, the complexity of the training intervention we were questioning, and the multi-disciplinary nature of our team (Psychologists, clinical anaesthetic and surgical Doctors, and Medical Educators), a Grounded Theory approach appropriate to cross-disciplinary health research was selected to ensure the most nuanced reflections were sought from participants.…”
Section: Grounded Theory In Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To name a few recent examples, specifically in terms of clinical identities, Grounded Theory has been demonstrated to produce high quality findings on how nursing staff reconcile their identities as specialist practitioners, teachers, and Nurses [15,16], and in global studies, how clinicians learn [17], navigate their working environments [18][19][20], and negotiate their careerrelated errors and regrets [21][22][23][24]. It is with this reasoning, the complexity of the training intervention we were questioning, and the multi-disciplinary nature of our team (Psychologists, clinical anaesthetic and surgical Doctors, and Medical Educators), a Grounded Theory approach appropriate to cross-disciplinary health research was selected to ensure the most nuanced reflections were sought from participants.…”
Section: Grounded Theory In Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘… which implies students’ cultural/ linguistic differences alone impede their ability to meet academic outcomes’. (p.692) 20 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature and quality of learning were dependent on clinicians entering a dialogue with students linked to patient care. Scholz et al ( 5 ) and King et al ( 48 ) also highlight the importance of language in veterinary WCT, which is fundamentally a social enterprise. Participants learn both the technical terminology of the sciences alongside the tacit tone and language required for communicating successfully with clients and colleagues in various contexts, for example on the farmyard, in the consultation room, in theatre or the staff room.…”
Section: Socio-culturalist Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%