2019
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2019.2924846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Navigate Endoscopic Capsule Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For magnetic capsule robots or magnet-tipped tethered devices for medical applications, whose size can range from a few millimeters to centimeters in terms of the device diameter, localization and tracking of the device have been obtained from internal or external sensing (e.g., embedded Hall-effect sensors and inertial measurement units ,, or externally arranged Hall-effect sensor arrays ,, ) or real-time imaging (e.g., internal imaging using endoscopy cameras, , external imaging through optical or stereocameras, ,,, X-ray fluoroscopy, , magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound). The state observation from device tracking and localization through real-time sensing or visual feedback through imaging allows for the implementation of closed-loop feedback control or learning-based, data-driven control for intelligent magnetic manipulation. For small-scale magnetic soft robots, however, device tracking and localization for closed-loop control and advanced manipulation through internal or external sensing can be challenging due to their constrained size, and the state observation would rely mostly on the visual feedback from real-time external imaging.…”
Section: Considerations For Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For magnetic capsule robots or magnet-tipped tethered devices for medical applications, whose size can range from a few millimeters to centimeters in terms of the device diameter, localization and tracking of the device have been obtained from internal or external sensing (e.g., embedded Hall-effect sensors and inertial measurement units ,, or externally arranged Hall-effect sensor arrays ,, ) or real-time imaging (e.g., internal imaging using endoscopy cameras, , external imaging through optical or stereocameras, ,,, X-ray fluoroscopy, , magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound). The state observation from device tracking and localization through real-time sensing or visual feedback through imaging allows for the implementation of closed-loop feedback control or learning-based, data-driven control for intelligent magnetic manipulation. For small-scale magnetic soft robots, however, device tracking and localization for closed-loop control and advanced manipulation through internal or external sensing can be challenging due to their constrained size, and the state observation would rely mostly on the visual feedback from real-time external imaging.…”
Section: Considerations For Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [100], and omits the contribution of the electromagnet's magnetic field from the measured magnetic field, and calculates the 5-DOF information of the capsule in real-time using a nonlinear optimization algorithm. Thus, with this system, accurate inspection of the GI tract has been achieved through active control of CEs, multi-sensor positioning systems, and combined deep learning and sensor fusion techniques [100] .…”
Section: Electromagnetic Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[48] In other words, SAC learns a policy that successfully completes the task while acting as randomly as possible, which in practice often leads to robust policies that are tolerant of perturbations in environmental conditions. [37] SAC had previously proven useful for real-world robotic tasks with high-dimensional, continuous state and action spaces, [37,39] which suggested that it would be applicable to our microrobotic control problem. In previously reported applications of real-world RL with physical systems, [60] SAC was demonstrated to be highly sample-efficient, requiring relatively few environmental interactions in order to develop a successful policy.…”
Section: Entropy-regularized Deep Rl Enabled Continuous Microrobot Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RL algorithms have achieved success in a range of complex robotic control applications. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] For example, RL for robotic control has been demonstrated to create robotic control policies that achieve better performance than many humans at complex tasks such as grasping and accurate throwing of irregularly shaped objects into bins. [40] RL algorithms have also been shown to exceed human-level performance in complex virtual tasks with large possible state spaces that cannot be tractably and exhaustively modeled, such as the game of Go.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%