Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget’s theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically

Abstract

Learning to perceive is faced with a classical paradox: if understanding is required for perception, how can we learn to perceive something new, something we do not yet understand? According to the sensorimotor approach, perception involves mastery of regular sensorimotor co-variations that depend on the agent and the environment, also known as the “laws” of sensorimotor contingencies (SMCs). In this sense, perception involves enacting relevant sensorimotor skills in each situation. It is important for this proposal that such skills can be learned and refined with experience and yet up to this date, the sensorimotor approach has had no explicit theory of perceptual learning. The situation is made more complex if we acknowledge the open-ended nature of human learning. In this paper we propose Piaget’s theory of equilibration as a potential candidate to fulfill this role. This theory highlights the importance of intrinsic sensorimotor norms, in terms of the closure of sensorimotor schemes. It also explains how the equilibration of a sensorimotor organization faced with novelty or breakdowns proceeds by re-shaping pre-existing structures in coupling with dynamical regularities of the world. This way learning to perceive is guided by the equilibration of emerging forms of skillful coping with the world. We demonstrate the compatibility between Piaget’s theory and the sensorimotor approach by providing a dynamical formalization of equilibration to give an explicit micro-genetic account of sensorimotor learning and, by extension, of how we learn to perceive. This allows us to draw important lessons in the form of general principles for open-ended sensorimotor learning, including the need for an intrinsic normative evaluation by the agent itself. We also explore implications of our micro-genetic account at the personal level.

Skill Learning for Intelligent Robot by Perception-Action Integration: A View from Hierarchical Temporal Memory

“…It provides a sequence of predicted actions, including one-step or multistep predictions, but does not consider the potential information behind these predictions. From a biological viewpoint, the present version of HTM does not link the perceptual input with the action system to predict the future outcome of actions [25]; that is, it does not explain the perception of intentionality for goalrelated actions [26] or implement the understanding of the intention hidden in the sequential predicted actions [27] and how to learn to perceive something new [28]. Additionally, how the predicted actions guide the future perception process is not considered.…”

The spur of the moment: what jazz improvisation tells cognitive science

“…However, we suggest that alongside the notion of performance-in-the-flow elaborated by Dreyfus, there has to be emphasized a never-ending developmental aspect of enactive creation. In improvisation one is, as in learning, faced with a certain "breakdown" of one's habitual skills in continually occurring novel constraints from the interaction with the world (Di Paolo et al 2014). So a sense-maker must, to some degree, continuously engage with new situations she has not until now come to perceive or act in.…”

“…However while Sudnow does talk of his hand to coming to "know" and gaining a "potential for musical action", his account does not appear to imply that one's mind goes fully blank in absorbed coping as one comes to master "musical reaching" in improvisation. Rather, Sudnow's account illustrates the open-ended path of enactive perceptual learning that continues to create novel objects and, eventually, novel experiential domains (Di Paolo et al 2014).…”

Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making

“…Further exploration of this challenge is given in DiPaolo et al (2014); along with a specific proposal, inspired by Piaget, about the dynamical structure of the relevant subpersonal interactions.10.1057/9781137363367 -Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making, Edited by Massimiliano Cappuccio and Tom FroeseCopyright material from www.palgraveconnect.com -licensed to RMIT University Library -PalgraveConnect -2015-07-05…”