IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics 2014
DOI: 10.1109/btas.2014.6996298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to predict match scores for iris image quality assessment

Abstract: Individual image quality metrics that focus on a particular form of image degradation have the virtue of being readily decipherable but also the drawback of not relating directly to the purpose for which the image is used. We describe here a method for learning the quality of iris images from the output of iris matching algorithms. We extract a large number of image quality features forming a high dimensional feature vector and label each training image with the match score for its corresponding genuine image … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [23], the result of the iris segmentation module is used to form a quality score. Happold et al [24] proposed a method for predicting the iris matching scores of an iris image pair based on their quality features. They calculated these features for precisely segmented iris images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [23], the result of the iris segmentation module is used to form a quality score. Happold et al [24] proposed a method for predicting the iris matching scores of an iris image pair based on their quality features. They calculated these features for precisely segmented iris images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, some of the methods for iris quality assessment, such as [25,26], are proposed for NIR images, and only a few types of distortion are considered. Some other quality metrics, like those in [3,23,24], require a segmented iris image to calculate their quality features. They also take limited distortion types into account and are not expected to work well for quality assessment of authentic iris images taken in visible light in arbitrary environmental conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%