2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2019.00116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Predict Perceptual Distributions of Haptic Adjectives

Abstract: When humans touch an object with their fingertips, they can immediately describe its tactile properties using haptic adjectives, such as hardness and roughness; however, human perception is subjective and noisy, with significant variation across individuals and interactions. Recent research has worked to provide robots with similar haptic intelligence but was focused on identifying binary haptic adjectives, ignoring both attribute intensity and perceptual variability. Combining ordinal haptic adjective labels … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Ref. [22] complements this aspect of the study by confirming the antonym pairs of hard/soft, rough/smooth, and cold/warm, and more tactile information than the binary label is analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, Ref. [22] complements this aspect of the study by confirming the antonym pairs of hard/soft, rough/smooth, and cold/warm, and more tactile information than the binary label is analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In real scenes, humans who have a rich tactile perception system will obtain a delicate sensory feedback by touching an object and will have a specific cognition of the strength level of the object's attribute. For networks, only using binary tactile labels to describe objects will simplify object attributes to binary space and the network has a very rough understanding of the level of the strength of an object's attribute [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in [11,12], a number of different researchers were selected to give binary ratings to adjectives of different objects, but the antisense relationships between adjectives were not taken into account. Therefore, [13] complements this aspect of the study by confirming the antonym pairs of hard/soft, rough/smooth and cold/warm, And more tactile information than binary label is analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Touching an object will get a delicate sensory feedback and have a specific cognition of the strength of the object's attributes. However, for robot tactile perception, only using binary tactile labels to describe objects will simplify the object attributes to binary space [13], which makes the robot have a very rough cognition of the strength of the object attributes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 42 ] These researches related to sensing and classification of surface materials were useful to develop various haptic applications delivering the physical information to humans because the surface characteristics should be well recognized in advance. [ 43–45 ] However, these tactile material classifications do not represent the overall tactile sensation of human. Because the processing of tactile feeling by the human brain has not yet been revealed clearly and tactile responses vary among humans, it is challenging to imitate the tactile sensation by an artificial system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%