Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021
DOI: 10.21428/594757db.ce391ef3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Recover Reasoning Chains for Multi-Hop Question Answering via Cooperative Games

Abstract: We extend the formats of explanations in interpretable NLP with the proposed entity-centric reasoning chains for multi-hop question answering. We also propose a cooperative game approach to learn to recover such explanations from weakly supervised signals, i.e., the question-answer pairs. We evaluate our task and method via newly created benchmarks based on two multi-hop datasets, Hot-potQA and MedHop; and hand-labeled reasoning chains for the latter. The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to the following four reasons: 1) Tools not open-source, like Sherpa-ai [63] 2) Missing repositories: is the case of tools that have not yet released their codes after the paper publication: Chiron [65], FedHealth [66], FAE [67], GENO [68], FedTGan [69] and IPLS [71]. 3) Coherent but not suitable: is the case of LEAF [45], FL-Bench [70], and PyFed [57], which are positioned for benchmarking purposes and, therefore, might lack essential features for conducting more extensive research activities. FedGraphNN [46] is a sub-project of the more significant initiative called FedML [40] already included in this survey.…”
Section: Easy Integration With Other Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the following four reasons: 1) Tools not open-source, like Sherpa-ai [63] 2) Missing repositories: is the case of tools that have not yet released their codes after the paper publication: Chiron [65], FedHealth [66], FAE [67], GENO [68], FedTGan [69] and IPLS [71]. 3) Coherent but not suitable: is the case of LEAF [45], FL-Bench [70], and PyFed [57], which are positioned for benchmarking purposes and, therefore, might lack essential features for conducting more extensive research activities. FedGraphNN [46] is a sub-project of the more significant initiative called FedML [40] already included in this survey.…”
Section: Easy Integration With Other Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Missing repositories: is the case of tools that have not yet released their codes after the paper publication: Chiron [72], FedHealth [73], FAE [74], GENO [75], FedTGan [76] and IPLS [78]. 3) Coherent but not suitable: is the case of LEAF [52], FL-Bench [77], and PyFed [64], which are positioned for benchmarking purposes and, therefore, might lack essential features for conducting more extensive research activities. FedGraphNN [53] is a sub-project of the more significant initiative called FedML [48] already included in this survey.…”
Section: A Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph-based models (De Cao et al, 2018;Fang et al, 2019;Ding et al, 2019) utilize graph structure and graph neural network to model the connections among sentences or entities for multi-hop QA. There are works adopting chain-like reasoning to solve multi-hop textual QA (Chen et al, 2019a;Asai et al, 2019;Feng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%