1982
DOI: 10.1093/applin/3.1.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Say What You Mean in a Second Language: A Study of the Speech Act Performance of Learners of Hebrew as a Second Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
171
0
15

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
171
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…For applied linguists concerned with language acquisition and with intercultur al communicati on, the insights gained through analysis of the social aspects of language use are of particular importance. Recent studies of such speech acts as apologies (Cohen and Olshtain 1981, Olshtain 1983, Olshtain and Cohen 1983, directives (Ervin-Tripp 1976, Blum-Kulka 1982 In earlier work on the analysis of complimentin g behavior among middle-clas s Americans (Manes and, it was demonstrate d that there exists a considerabl e (and previously unsuspected) amount of patterning both at the syntactic and the semantic levels. Examination of a corpus of approximate ly seven hundred examples of compliments uttered"in day-to-day interaction s and collected ethnographically , revealed that the spontaneity with which they are often associated is linked more to their freedom of occurrence within an <inter-action than to any originality in structure or lexicon.…”
Section: University Of Pennsylvani Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For applied linguists concerned with language acquisition and with intercultur al communicati on, the insights gained through analysis of the social aspects of language use are of particular importance. Recent studies of such speech acts as apologies (Cohen and Olshtain 1981, Olshtain 1983, Olshtain and Cohen 1983, directives (Ervin-Tripp 1976, Blum-Kulka 1982 In earlier work on the analysis of complimentin g behavior among middle-clas s Americans (Manes and, it was demonstrate d that there exists a considerabl e (and previously unsuspected) amount of patterning both at the syntactic and the semantic levels. Examination of a corpus of approximate ly seven hundred examples of compliments uttered"in day-to-day interaction s and collected ethnographically , revealed that the spontaneity with which they are often associated is linked more to their freedom of occurrence within an <inter-action than to any originality in structure or lexicon.…”
Section: University Of Pennsylvani Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For applied linguists concerned with language acquisition and with intercultur al communicati on, the insights gained through analysis of the social aspects of language use are of particular importance. Recent studies of such speech acts as apologies (Cohen and Olshtain 1981, Olshtain 1983, Olshtain and Cohen 1983, directives (Ervin-Tripp 1976, Blum-Kulka 1982, expressions of disapproval (d'fl.mico-Re isner 1983), and compliments , Wolfson and Manes 198D, Manes 1983, Wolfson 1981) have rich implication s. It has been demonstrated again and again that beneath the surface structure of the linguistic forms and the social etiquette invalved in their use, lies a gold mine of information about the value systems of speakers. In studying apologies, for example, we learn what constitutes an offense, and in studying compliments we learn about what speakers value.…”
Section: University Of Pennsylvani Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the first two types of task focus mainly on the participants' interpretation of utterances, the last one can be used to elicit speech from participants and was therefore the obvious choice for us. The DCT method was first used by Blum-Kulka and Olshtain (1984) in the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realisation Patterns project and was devised by Blum-Kulka (1982) herself. More specifically, a DCT gives participants a situation (sometimes including the start of a dialogue) to which they have to respond by writing what their reaction at that stage of the interaction would be.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study the researcher is going to use an open questionnaire called Discourse Completion Task (DCT) on request developed by Schauer (2009) and another DCT on apology which is a modified version of 'Discourse Completion Test' used in Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) (Blum-Kulka, 1982). The abovementioned CCSARP project focused on two speech acts (requests and apologies) in eight languages or varieties.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%