2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to segment under various forms of weak supervision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
165
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, without explicitly modelling the label noise and solving it as a denoising problem, their performance is much weaker than that of ours as demonstrated in our experiments (see Section 5). Another existing work that is worth mentioning here is that of Xu et al [18]. Formulating the WSSS problem as a large-margin clustering method, this work is related to ours in that both methods iteratively estimate the superpixel labels and update superpixel appearance models 1 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, without explicitly modelling the label noise and solving it as a denoising problem, their performance is much weaker than that of ours as demonstrated in our experiments (see Section 5). Another existing work that is worth mentioning here is that of Xu et al [18]. Formulating the WSSS problem as a large-margin clustering method, this work is related to ours in that both methods iteratively estimate the superpixel labels and update superpixel appearance models 1 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Existing weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) methods employ a variety of models including latent topic model [9], conditional random field (CRF) [17], [19], linear SVM [18], label propagation [13], multiinstance learning [10], [11], clustering [14], and sparse reconstruction [15]. They also differ in whether superpixelbased object appearance is explicitly modelled and whether they operate under an inductive or transductive setting, or both.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without additional priors only poor results are obtained. Using superpixels to inform about the object shape helps [33,47] and so does using priors on the object size [31]. [18] carefully uses CRFs to propagate the seeds across the image during training, while [36] exploits segment proposals for this.…”
Section: ( §4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weakly supervised learning problem can be seen as a specific instance of learning from constraints [38,47]. Instead of explicitly supervising the output, the available labels provide a constraint on the desired output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some state-of-the-art methods [13] rely on dense pixel-wise correspondences, which is infeasible to apply to a large dataset of 3D medical images. In an attempt to overcome such issues, other methods advocate using superpixels in an image as a building block in unsupervised and weakly supervised segmentation [14,18,7], where feature descriptors are typically computed on a pixel-level and then aggregated within superpixels; however, descriptor choice is non-trivial and can still be computationally costly for 3D images depending on the type of features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%