2000
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning tool or potplant stand? Students' opinions of learning from a CAL program in a distance education context

Abstract: <span>Although teaching institutions are continually moving towards electronic forms of delivering learning material, a study of first year adult distance chemistry students found that they had developed a successful learning profile based on their present printed learning material and were reluctant to consider the use of alternative methods of delivery. The reasons for this reluctance were explored by developing a Computer Aided Learning program, based on the students existing learning strategies, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies comparing the three media, students reported they better :~i~©~:C~ SIGCSE Bulletin understood the material, were more eager to study, and found it easier to maintain concentration with CAL programs [8,9].…”
Section: The Importance Of Technology-based Learning Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies comparing the three media, students reported they better :~i~©~:C~ SIGCSE Bulletin understood the material, were more eager to study, and found it easier to maintain concentration with CAL programs [8,9].…”
Section: The Importance Of Technology-based Learning Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three people offered no reason, two claimed that they had no time, one stated that the valuable content of the CD was not realised until it was seen on display at the residential school, one claimed to be sufficiently experienced in the procedures already and one did not get a copy of the CD due to an enrolment aberration. One student also stated that he/she was sufficiently "satisfied with the printed laboratory manual" not to examine the CD, which parallels an observation made by Lyall and McNamara (2000) relating to the perceived "risk" of undertaking a new learning method.…”
Section: Analysis Of Responses and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Since DE students are typically concerned with the efficiency of their learning (Lyall and McNamara, 2000), a CD was seen to possess all required features.…”
Section: Multimedia Based Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…lecturer/tutorial substitution (McInnes et al 1995), provides flexibility in learning (Peat and Franklin 2002) in an era where students have difficulties in fulfilling rigid course obligations (McInnis, James, and McNaught 1995). E-learning has the potential to reduce instruction time and workloads (Lyell and McNamara 2000;Kulik, Kulik, and Cohen 1980), allowing more alternative interfacing with students (Peat and Franklin 2002). It can also lead to a change in the role of the tutor as a facilitator of knowledge (Laurillard 2002), offering means of coping with larger classes (Bork 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%