2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2010.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning unethical practices from a co-worker: The peer effect of Jose Canseco

Abstract: This paper examines the issue of whether workers learn productive skills from their co-workers, even if those skills are unethical. Speci…cally, we estimate whether Jose Canseco, a star baseball player in the late 1980's and 1990's, a¤ected the performance of his teammates by introducing them to steroids. Using panel data, we show that a player's performance increases signi…cantly after they played with Jose Canseco. After checking 30 comparable players from the same era, we …nd that no other baseball player p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars in economics and psychology have advanced our understanding of peer effects and the underlying mechanisms by capitalizing on comprehensive laboratory and field studies over the past decades, particularly with respect to the study of pro-social behavior, cooperation, and reciprocity (Offerman, 2002;Frey and Meier, 2004;Croson and Shang, 2008;Shang and Croson, 2008;Gächter et al, 2013;Thöni and Gächter, 2015). Peer effects on anti-social behavior have been examined with respect to doping (Gould and Kaplan, 2011), dishonesty ) and theft (Falk and Fischbacher, 2002). 1 Peers have also been found to affect academic gains (Duflo et al, 2011), investment decisions (Bursztyn et al, 2014), littering behavior (Cialdini et al, 1990), productivity at work (Ichino and Maggi, 2000;Falk and Ichino, 2006;Mas and Moretti, 2009), juvenile behavior (Damm and Dustmann, 2014), and charitable giving (Meer, 2011;Smith et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars in economics and psychology have advanced our understanding of peer effects and the underlying mechanisms by capitalizing on comprehensive laboratory and field studies over the past decades, particularly with respect to the study of pro-social behavior, cooperation, and reciprocity (Offerman, 2002;Frey and Meier, 2004;Croson and Shang, 2008;Shang and Croson, 2008;Gächter et al, 2013;Thöni and Gächter, 2015). Peer effects on anti-social behavior have been examined with respect to doping (Gould and Kaplan, 2011), dishonesty ) and theft (Falk and Fischbacher, 2002). 1 Peers have also been found to affect academic gains (Duflo et al, 2011), investment decisions (Bursztyn et al, 2014), littering behavior (Cialdini et al, 1990), productivity at work (Ichino and Maggi, 2000;Falk and Ichino, 2006;Mas and Moretti, 2009), juvenile behavior (Damm and Dustmann, 2014), and charitable giving (Meer, 2011;Smith et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of performance-enhancing drugs in professional baseball has also made it a useful setting to examine whether information about unethical activities is learned from one's co-workers. One study attempted to examine whether Jose Canseco, a star baseball player who subsequently confessed to using steroids, affected the performance of his teammates by introducing them to steroids [13]. Players' performances were found to increase significantly in the seasons after they played with Canseco.…”
Section: What Causes Unethical Behavior In the Workplace?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they consider and explicitly model individual self-selection into teams, while in our network production function team selection is not an individual choice. Finally, Gould and Kaplan (2011) consider the effects of a Major league Baseball player's steroid use on the productivity of his teammates. However, they are teasing out the effects of a single player (and not a network of players) and, therefore, ignore all the problems associated with modeling and estimating peer-effects that Manski (1993), Angrist (2013), and others have highlighted.…”
Section: Peer Effects In Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%