2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning verbs more effectively through meaning congruent action animations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, compared to children who received still pictures, the children that saw congruent animations performed better on an expressive test of understanding (Hald et al 2015).…”
Section: Dynamic Multimedia Vocabulary Training Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, compared to children who received still pictures, the children that saw congruent animations performed better on an expressive test of understanding (Hald et al 2015).…”
Section: Dynamic Multimedia Vocabulary Training Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To apply the idea that observing movement by others will aid word learning, Hald et al (2015) explored the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations on verb learning in children. In this study, Dutch primary school children (aged 7-8 years old) received one of three different animation training conditions in combination with the verbs they were asked to learn (e.g., chisel).…”
Section: Dynamic Multimedia Vocabulary Training Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, a recent study on effects of animations on action word learning (e.g. to chisel, to hoe) in the first language (Hald et al, 2015), included a mismatched animation condition, to control for effects of movements shown in the animations. Results showed that word learning was significantly hampered in the animation condition in which the actions depicted in the animation mismatched the word to be learned compared with when it matched the word to be learned.…”
Section: Multimedia and Coherence Effects In Word Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, both principles entail that the presentation of extraneous information should be avoided, because it hampers learning compared to instructional materials in which this information has been eliminated. For instance, a negative effect of extraneous information on learning has been shown to occur when multimedia learning materials are enriched with interesting and entertaining information (i.e., seductive details; Harp & Mayer, ; Lehman, Schraw, McCrudden, & Hartly, ; Mayer, Heiser, & Lonn, ; Moreno & Mayer, ; Rey, ; Sanchez & Wiley, ), when information on related systems is presented when learning about a specific system (Mayer, DeLeeuw, & Ayres, ), or when mismatching pictorial information is provided when learning word definitions (De Nooijer, Van Gog, Paas, & Zwaan, ; Hald, Van den Hurk, & Bekkering, ; Rop et al, , ). Moreover, the effect has been demonstrated when text accompanying pictures or animation is presented in both spoken and written form (e.g., Craig, Gholson, & Driscoll, ; Mayer et al, ; but see Mayer & Johnson, ; Yue, Bjork, & Bjork, ), when self‐containing diagrams are accompanied by textual explanations (Bobis, Sweller, & Cooper, ; Chandler & Sweller, ) and when unnecessary details and examples are added to learning materials (e.g., Mayer, Bove, Bryman, Mars, & Tapangco, ; Reder & Anderson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%