2015
DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
107
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…And, if this is the case, then how can ECE be designed or organized in a way that children's innate relational way of being in the world is not lost but maintained and perhaps even strengthened? But also how can we expand inclusion of the non-human world, as in Fulghum's short essay about Kindergarten, to what some refer to now as interspecies learning (Taylor and Pacini-Ketchabaw 2015). The answers to these questions may hold an important key in transitioning towards a more sustainable world.…”
Section: Perspectives On Sustainability and Ecementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And, if this is the case, then how can ECE be designed or organized in a way that children's innate relational way of being in the world is not lost but maintained and perhaps even strengthened? But also how can we expand inclusion of the non-human world, as in Fulghum's short essay about Kindergarten, to what some refer to now as interspecies learning (Taylor and Pacini-Ketchabaw 2015). The answers to these questions may hold an important key in transitioning towards a more sustainable world.…”
Section: Perspectives On Sustainability and Ecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied to ECE, this suggests that when children are given the opportunity to enter different learning spaces and to go between them, the discontinuities that occur when crossing the boundaries between them will heighten their awareness of different ways of being in the world and of seeing the world from different vantage points. Taylor and Pacini-Ketchabaw (2015) deliberately reposition children within the full, heterogeneous and interdependent multispecies common worlds in which we all live. Sustainability-oriented ECE ideally creates opportunities for children's boundary crossing between different vantage points in a web of generative relationships that go far beyond the confines of a room or a building, although such physical spaces can be designed in a way that also allows for boundary crossing.…”
Section: Sustainability By Default and The Affordances Of Placementioning
confidence: 99%
“…net) and there is concern that all too often those who are interested in these relational ontologies are making ' … everything being connected, without adequately addressing the complex structure of connectivity ' (de Frietas 2016, 2). Whilst this paper does not address the complex structure of connectivity, it gestures towards the complexity and politics of these connections by bringing together feminism, environmental humanities and 'common world' pedagogies (see www.commonworlds.net; Taylor and Pacini-Ketchabaw 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethics of these contexts are attended to as a way to enact a different kind of early childhood pedagogy, or a 'common worlds pedagogy' (see www.commonworlds. net; Taylor and Pacini-Ketchabaw 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We-Ildikó (an early childhood educator) and Nicole (a doctoral student pedagogista)-position our pedagogical practices within a commonworlding ethic (Pacini-Ketchabaw, Taylor, & Blaise, 2016) and cultivate a sustained engagement with "the broader, relational contexts that children inhabit as integral parts of the universe" (Blaise, Hamm, & Iorio, 2016, p. 2). Our inquiry work launches from a politicized attention to the contested ethical dimensions of pedagogy, wherein a necessity to confront ongoing settler colonialism (Clark, PaciniKetchabaw, & Hodgins, 2014;Nxumalo, 2016), a concern with the infiltration of neoliberal paradigms within education (Ashton, 2014;Osgood, Scarlett, & Giugni, 2015), and an impulse to be response-able to contemporary Euro-Western anthropogenic forces (Taylor & Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2015) inform our practices.In the furniture-free space of the child care centre, we began to put our pedagogical practice to work with movement. Engaging with Drawing on an inquiry-based project focused on experimenting with movement in Canadian early childhood education, this article imagines how educators might think (with) movement pedagogically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%