Least-Developed Countries in a World of Global Value Chains: Are WTO Trade Negotiations Helping?

Abstract

Nimble trade and industrial policy is essential for Least-Developed Countries (LDCs) to thrive in a world of global value chains (GVCs). 'Adaptive states' in LDCs need to create and exploit policy space in national decision-making, build specific production capabilities to participate and meaningfully capture value in GVCs, and handle policy stretches arising from factors and actors they cannot control. In this article, we show that the outcomes of recent multilateral trade negotiations will facilitate these processes only partially. The World Trade Organization's (WTO) Bali and Nairobi Ministerial Declarations have been commonly portrayed as relative victories for developing countries, but they have not provided sufficient steps forward for LDCs. While the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement can help integration into GVCs by enabling freer imports and exports, supportive industrial policies are also needed to guide investment in the direction that allows for flexible specialization and domestic value additionthese options are severely limited in the current WTO regime. The legally-binding commitments made in Nairobi on rules of origin are also a positive step, but must be linked to the yet unmet duty-free and quota-free commitments. We conclude by arguing that a future agenda for LDCs should focus on supply-side constraints, as well as on allowing nimble industrial and trade policies that can facilitate meaningful participation in some GVCsand non-participation in others that are more detrimental to broad-based development.

Can the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership minimise the harm from the United States–China trade war?

“…Although all six non‐ASEAN RCEP member countries have also concluded FTAs with ASEAN, the India–ASEAN FTA is one with the lowest degree of liberalisation and thus India is highly concerned that the RCEP tariff concessions far exceed this existing FTA (Oba, ). But in the long run, the lowering of tariffs in developing countries via participation in FTAs such as the RCEP could lead to more investment from RCEP members abroad to enhance global value chains (Flentø & Ponte, ). This ties in well with India's domestic policy to attract foreign direct investment and build on forward and backward linkages in the supply chain.…”

Reducing Edible Oil Import Dependency in Tanzania: A Computable General Equilibrium CGE Approach

“…The increase in supplies of raw materials from the agricultural sector to the agro-related industries and services leads to the reallocation of factors of production toward the agro-related industries and services, causing a decline in the production of non-agro-related industries and services. Similarly, an increase in agricultural commodity production positively affects industrialization, as it provides not only raw materials for the industry but also food for the industrial workforce [30][31][32][33][34]. This indicates interventions geared toward an increase in production, if they are sustained, could help the country produce at self-sufficient levels, thus reducing edible oil imports.…”

Impact of Global Value Chain Embedding on Total-Factor Energy Productivity of Chinese Industrial Sectors

“…Yanning Chen pointed out that increasing the participation of GVC in the power industry can help improve the predictability and attractiveness of investment and technology transfer [7]. Flent and Ponte believed that for the least developed countries, increasing the participation of GVC in the industrial sector can help increase the industrial factor productivity [8]. Jay Sterling Gregg et al conducted a case study to analyze CE (cellulosic ethanol) manufacturing plants in various places in Europe from the perspective of GVC.…”