2019
DOI: 10.1190/geo2019-0005.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Least-squares reverse time migration in the presence of velocity errors

Abstract: Least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM), which aims to match the modeled data with the observed data in an iterative inversion procedure, is very sensitive to the accuracy of the migration velocity model. If the migration velocity model contains errors, the final migration image may be defocused and incoherent. We have used an LSRTM scheme based on the subsurface offset extended imaging condition, least-squares extended reverse time migration (LSERTM), to provide a better solution when large velocity erro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if we have access to ∆d e , then each desired coefficient of ∆m can be computed independently by cross-correlation of the associated forward-propagated source-side wavefield with the backward-propagated receiver-side wavefield. This memory efficiency is a main advantage of our algorithm over the existing algorithms based on model extension that require to keep in memory the model for all of the desired range of subsurface offsets [4,5,7,20,24,31]. We compute the desired search direction δm by averaging the extended coefficients over a ball around each physical point.…”
Section: Computing δM From ∆Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if we have access to ∆d e , then each desired coefficient of ∆m can be computed independently by cross-correlation of the associated forward-propagated source-side wavefield with the backward-propagated receiver-side wavefield. This memory efficiency is a main advantage of our algorithm over the existing algorithms based on model extension that require to keep in memory the model for all of the desired range of subsurface offsets [4,5,7,20,24,31]. We compute the desired search direction δm by averaging the extended coefficients over a ball around each physical point.…”
Section: Computing δM From ∆Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea comes from the fact that the reflection energy interfere constructively within the first Fresnel zone [16,22]. Yang et al [31] used a similar idea but they averaged the coefficients over a horizontal disk centered at the physical point.…”
Section: Computing δM From ∆Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RTM is a seismic technique, which provides the visualization of the subsurface reflectivity using recorded seismic data. It is highly sensitivity to velocity errors, which result in a defocused and incoherent migration image [41]. Hence, RTM technique has been widely used as a quality-control (QC) tool in seismic imaging [42].…”
Section: ) Low-resolution Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [34] inverted P-and S-wave impedance perturbations with pseudo-Hessian preconditioning in ELSRTM. In 2019, Yang et al [35] utilized an LSRTM scheme based on the subsurface offset domain extended imaging condition to obtain a better resolution when large velocity errors exist. In 2021, Zhong et al [36] developed a new scheme based on the elastic velocity−stress equation in isotropic media, and inverted reflectivities of Pand S-wave velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%