2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0898-1221(00)00235-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Least-squares solution for inverse eigenpair problem of nonnegative definite matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some results of the matrix inverse problem for bi-symmetric matrices have been obtained by using the Moore-Penrose generalized inverse and the singular value decomposition (SVD) [19][20][21][22]. In addition, the matrix inverse problem for bi-symmetric matrices with a submatrix constraint has been discussed in [23] and the solvability conditions as well as its general solution have been derived by using the generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some results of the matrix inverse problem for bi-symmetric matrices have been obtained by using the Moore-Penrose generalized inverse and the singular value decomposition (SVD) [19][20][21][22]. In addition, the matrix inverse problem for bi-symmetric matrices with a submatrix constraint has been discussed in [23] and the solvability conditions as well as its general solution have been derived by using the generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let H q be a BS solution of equation (10). Then for any starting BS matrix H q0 , we have From Newton's method and the above theorem, we easily prove the following main theorem.…”
Section: An Iterative Methods For Finding the Bs Solution Of Equationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Let H q be a symmetric solution of equation (10). Then for any starting symmetric matrix H q0 , we have…”
Section: An Iterative Methods For Solving (10)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. , n), in R n×n , a new inner product is defined as follows: , then K is a closed convex cone and the following result holds; the proof is similar to that of Lemma 2.7 in [21] (see also [24] …”
Section: ) For Anymentioning
confidence: 99%