1994
DOI: 10.1109/12.286311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Least upper bounds on OBDD sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first bound the number of different subtrees with at most k leaves in t. Afterwards we will estimate the size of the remaining top tree. The same strategy is used for instance in [22,34] to derive a worst-case upper bound on the size of binary decision diagrams. Claim 1.…”
Section: Size Of the Minimal Dagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first bound the number of different subtrees with at most k leaves in t. Afterwards we will estimate the size of the remaining top tree. The same strategy is used for instance in [22,34] to derive a worst-case upper bound on the size of binary decision diagrams. Claim 1.…”
Section: Size Of the Minimal Dagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can then deduce that r i ≤ 2 i and r i ≤ 2 2 n−i , which leads to the well known property (see [2] or [5]):…”
Section: Canonical Reduced Graphs Of Boolean Functionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Instead, we will describe an OBDD WP(f ) from [17,13,4] that meets the upperbound OBDD(P f ) ≤ (2 + o (1))2 m /m. This OBDD also has the benefit of having optimal length m. Based on this result, even if f is an arbitrary Boolean database, the BddCpir protocol has communication complexity Θ(k · log 2 n) and server's online computational complexity Θ(n/ log n).…”
Section: Class 1: Arbitrary Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, let f : {0, 1} m → {0, 1} for some ≥ 1. By the already mentioned upperbound of [17,13,4], clearly BDD(f ) ≤ · (2 + o(1))2 m /m by just evaluating BDDs in parallel. Thus, there exists a sublinear-computation CPIR protocol for say any ≤ m/3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation