A study was performed to determine through computer fire modeling up to what extent a room fire in which a flat screen television is the first major item ignited is more likely to result in flashover if the television casing is not treated with flame retardants. This was accomplished by quantifying the risk of flashover in a living room or bedroom due to a fire in which a flat screen television is the first major item ignited, and by calculating the ratio of the risk measures for televisions with untreated casing versus those with flame retardant treated casing. This ratio is an indication of the increased likelihood of flashover should flame retardant treated television casings be replaced with untreated casings. The results of the risk quantification indicate that living room fires initiated with a flat screen television are between 4.2 and 15.2 times more likely to result in flashover when the casing is not treated with flame retardants compared to a flame retardant treated television. For fires in the (master) bedroom, the relative likelihood is between 4.1 and 15.5. The relative likelihood of flashover is slightly lower for apartments than for single family homes.The calculated ratio varies depending on the assumed probability that the ignition source is sufficiently severe to ignite a television with flame retardant treated casing.fire modeling, fire risk assessment, flame retardants, flashover, television fires
| INTRODUCTIONComparative furniture calorimeter and room fire testing over the past 35 years has demonstrated that television (TV) sets in the United States are much more difficult to ignite and, when ignited, release heat at a significantly lower rate than European TVs. [1][2][3][4][5] The primary reason for the difference in fire performance is that in the United States, the casing needs to have a UL 94 V-0 rating while a less stringent HB rating is required in Europe. To achieve a V-0 rating, the casing material, typically high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), needs to be treated with flame retardants (FR). FR treatment is generally not needed to meet the HB rating requirements.Table 1 shows some select results from three comparative studies. The peak heat release rate (HRR) is indicative of the hazard associated with a TV fire. Table 1 indicates that total mass loss measurements in the earlier studies, involving then popular cathode-ray tube (CRT) TVs, are comparable to the mass loss measurements from the recent study, which involved now popular flat screen TVs. It should be noted that the TV contents were removed prior to testing