2020
DOI: 10.1214/20-ejp447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaves on the line and in the plane

Abstract: The dead leaves model (DLM) provides a random tessellation of d-space, representing the visible portions of fallen leaves on the ground when d = 2. For d = 1, we establish formulae for the intensity, two-point correlations, and asymptotic covariances for the point process of cell boundaries, along with a functional CLT. For d = 2 we establish analogous results for the random surface measure of cell boundaries, and also determine the intensity of cells in a more general setting than in earlier work of Cowan and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our definition of the RSC is an analog of the RSA. Among other random coverings, we mention the procedure introduced by Matheron [57,58], known as visible confetti or the dead leaves model (DLM), see [59][60][61][62][63][64][65]. In this model, leaves fall at random onto the ground long enough, so the ground is completely covered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our definition of the RSC is an analog of the RSA. Among other random coverings, we mention the procedure introduced by Matheron [57,58], known as visible confetti or the dead leaves model (DLM), see [59][60][61][62][63][64][65]. In this model, leaves fall at random onto the ground long enough, so the ground is completely covered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the model assumptions in [18] make it applicable only to scenarios with spatially uniform point density. More recently, functionals of random tessellations of the pure-birth processes (the "dead leaves" model) were shown to converge to Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%