2008
DOI: 10.1512/iumj.2008.57.3168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lebesgue points and capacities via boxing inequality in metric spaces

Abstract: Abstract. The purpose of this work is to study regularity of Sobolev functions on metric measure spaces equipped with a doubling measure and supporting a weak Poincaré inequality. We show that every Sobolev function whose gradient is integrable to power one has Lebesgue points outside a set of 1-capacity zero. We also show that 1-capacity is equivalent to the Hausdorff content of codimension one and study characterizations of 1-capacity in terms of Frostman's lemma and functions of bounded variation. As the ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is shown for p > 1 by Theorem 4.1 in [22] and for p = 1 by Theorem 4.1 in [21]. By assumption (1.2), u * (x) = 0 for every x ∈ X \ .…”
Section: Remark 52 If X Does Not Support a (1 P)-poincaré Inequalitmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is shown for p > 1 by Theorem 4.1 in [22] and for p = 1 by Theorem 4.1 in [21]. By assumption (1.2), u * (x) = 0 for every x ∈ X \ .…”
Section: Remark 52 If X Does Not Support a (1 P)-poincaré Inequalitmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Then u ∈ N 1, p (X ) and u = 0 in X \ . By Theorem 4.1 in [22] and Theorem 4.1 in [21], p-quasievery point of X is a Lebesgue point of u. Hence for p-quasievery x ∈ X \ , we have (B(x, r )) Remark 5.4 The assumption that is open can be replaced with the condition that is Borel measurable in Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Remark 52 If X Does Not Support a (1 P)-poincaré Inequalitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence some information is inevitably lost once we pass from the pointwise p-Hardy inequality or uniform p-fatness (for 1 < p < ∞) to Hausdorff contents; in the case p = 1 there is indeed an equivalence, cf. [25]. However, by the self-improvement of the assertions of Theorem 2, we can still have the following equivalent characterization in terms of Hausdorff contents (see also [10,28]).…”
Section: Hausdorff Contentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Estimate (12) follows easily from a standard telescoping argument, see for example [13]. Note that u has Lebesgue points almost everywhere in the p-capacity sense, see [23,25]. …”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation