2010
DOI: 10.5802/jedp.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lecture notes : Global Well-posedness, scattering and blow up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger and wave equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition (1.10) leads us to the inequality (|∇u| 2 −(1−η)g|u| p+1 ) dx < −C for some 0 ≤ η < 1 and C > 0 and hence to the finite time blowup through the localized virial identity (6.5) below. This argument also appears in some literatures (see [21,2,13]). In (2) the moment condition |x|ϕ ∈ L 2…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The condition (1.10) leads us to the inequality (|∇u| 2 −(1−η)g|u| p+1 ) dx < −C for some 0 ≤ η < 1 and C > 0 and hence to the finite time blowup through the localized virial identity (6.5) below. This argument also appears in some literatures (see [21,2,13]). In (2) the moment condition |x|ϕ ∈ L 2…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…We are indebted to M. Visan and X. Zhang and to J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, for pointing this out to us. A correct proof is given in [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(Long time perturbation theory; see also [18], [19] and [45]) Let I ⊂R be a time interval. Let t 0 ∈I, (u 0 , u 1 )∈Ḣ 1 ×L 2 and some constants M, A, A >0 be given.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This says that, for t ∈ I, ∇u(t) · ∂ t u(t) = ∇u 0 · u 1 . Finally, the analog of the "Perturbation Theorem" also holds in this context (see [22]). All the corollaries of the Perturbation Theorem also hold.…”
Section: This Shows I)mentioning
confidence: 94%