2018
DOI: 10.4171/prims/54-4-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lecture Notes On Differential Calculus on $\sf {RCD}$ Spaces

Abstract: These notes are intended to be an invitation to differential calculus on \sf {RCD} spaces. We start by introducing the concept of an " L^2 -normed L^\infty -module" and show how it can be used to develop a first-order (Sobolev) differential calculus on general metric measure spaces. In the second part of the manuscript we see how, on spaces with Ricci cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is interesting because one can define the differential du of u, even in very abstract situations [17], by means related to Sobolev calculus on the metric measure space (Y, d Y , μ := u (|du| 2 HS m)) and tangent vector fields in this metric measure space only see directions which are tangent to the graph of u (this is rather obvious in this example, but see for instance [31] for a discussion of this phenomenon in more general cases). This means that, curiously, u cannot be computed starting from du and using Sobolev calculus in the spirit developed in [27,32], simply because u does not belong to the tangent module L 2 μ (T Y)…”
Section: Remark 411mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is interesting because one can define the differential du of u, even in very abstract situations [17], by means related to Sobolev calculus on the metric measure space (Y, d Y , μ := u (|du| 2 HS m)) and tangent vector fields in this metric measure space only see directions which are tangent to the graph of u (this is rather obvious in this example, but see for instance [31] for a discussion of this phenomenon in more general cases). This means that, curiously, u cannot be computed starting from du and using Sobolev calculus in the spirit developed in [27,32], simply because u does not belong to the tangent module L 2 μ (T Y)…”
Section: Remark 411mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To keep the presentation short we assume that the reader is familiar with the concept of Sobolev functions on a metric measure space [4,5,13,28], with that of L 0 -normed modules and differentials of real valued Sobolev maps and with second order calculus on RCD spaces [16,18].…”
Section: Sobolev Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties of pullbacks have been studied in [16,18] for maps satisfying u * m X ≤ Cm Y ; the generalization to the case of L 0 -normed modules has been considered in [9,22].…”
Section: Proposition 24 (Universal Property Of the Pullback) With Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever H 1,2 (X, d, m) is a Hilbert space, we will say that (X, d, m) is infinitesimally Hilbertian. In this case, we recall from [27] that the tangent module L 2 (T X) and the corresponding gradient map ∇ : H 1,2 (X, d, m) → L 2 (T X) can be characterised as follows: L 2 (T X) is an L 2 (m)-normed L ∞ (m)-module (in the sense of [28,Definition 1.3]) that is generated by ∇f :…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%