2016
DOI: 10.18740/s41k5x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left Behind By the Alter: Why Queers and Sociologists Need Materialist Feminism

Abstract: The United States marriage rights movement just culminated in July 2015 with the Supreme Court declaring same-sex marriage constitutional. The mainstream -the mainstream media and the mainstream LGBT rights movement -all applaud this trajectory, with no attention to those who get left behind in marriage politics. In this paper, I will argue that same-sex marriage is in need of a materialist feminist analysis. I will critique my discipline -Sociology -for failing to adequately theorize same-sex marriage as a ke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our discussion above foregrounds feminist critiques of marriage in terms of internal relationship dynamics, yet socialist feminists have long argued marriage has a wider structural function as a lynchpin of state control and of racial and class power. Ensuring stability of property between families and through descent, marriage has allowed upper- and middle-class White families to entrench ideological and economic privilege, as well as facilitating nation-building and the stabilisation of state borders (Edwards, 2016; Ingraham, 2008; Peterson, 2014). This is true even of more progressive forms of marriage (Josephson, 2010; Wilson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our discussion above foregrounds feminist critiques of marriage in terms of internal relationship dynamics, yet socialist feminists have long argued marriage has a wider structural function as a lynchpin of state control and of racial and class power. Ensuring stability of property between families and through descent, marriage has allowed upper- and middle-class White families to entrench ideological and economic privilege, as well as facilitating nation-building and the stabilisation of state borders (Edwards, 2016; Ingraham, 2008; Peterson, 2014). This is true even of more progressive forms of marriage (Josephson, 2010; Wilson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legislative changes, like marriage equality, impact LGBTQ+ people in many different ways, from not at all to very much (Edwards, ). In the case of marriage equality, one supposed benefit of marriage is access to partners’ health insurance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%