Left out in the cold? New energy tariffs, low‐income households and the fuel poor

Abstract

Two new gas tariffs were introduced in 2000, with contrasting effects. One abolished a fixed standing charge, while the other, specifically targeted at low‐income consumers, introduced a preset charge, independent of fuel consumption, for eligible consumers. We analyse the effect of the abolition of the standing charge on different household groups, including the fuel poor, the current focus of government and regulatory policy. We find that while low‐income groups have benefited more than others from abolition of the standing charge, the fuel poor have gained less than average. We contrast this with the other targeted preset charge scheme.

On the power of indicators: how the choice of fuel poverty indicator affects the identification of the target population

“…C Potential drivers of fuel poverty: summary of the litera-801 ture 802 Table C.1 -Potential drivers of fuel poverty: summary of the literature. Based on Bennett et al (2002), Scott et al (2008), Healy (2003), Healy and Clinch (2004), Palmer et al (2008) Single; Widowed; Divorced; Childless couple; Couple with child(ren); Single-parent family.…”

Is Market-Oriented Reform Producing a ‘Two-Track’ Europe? Evidence From Electricity and Telecommunications

“…Most of the studies that have used revealed preferences to evaluate public infrastructure services regulation are based on national Household Budget Surveys (HBSs), essentially, surveys disaggregating household expenditure by categories. In Spain, studies include Arocena (2003) and Duarte et al (2010); and in the UK, Gómez‐Lobo (1996), Burns et al (1996), Waddams Price and Hancock (1998) and Bennett et al (2002). However, taken alone, revealed preferences do not permit observers to analyze behavioural aspects such as why a service is not used, or to understand how biases identified by behavioural economists lead to individuals not maximizing their utility.…”

Tackling fuel poverty through facilitating energy tariff switching: a participatory action research study in vulnerable groups

“…The situation is worsening due to increasing fuel prices (2) and the global economic downturn (3). Fuel poverty is more common in certain groups, including older people (4), low-income and larger households (5). The lowest income decile spend around 6% of income on energy; the richest spend less than 2% (1,6).…”

“…The Government agrees that there is a need for consumer advice in complex markets such as energy, especially for vulnerable people. Social tariffs were introduced to help vulnerable or low income households pay for fuel costs, but have largely disappeared (3,5), although the Warm Home Discount does help vulnerable groups with annual fuel bill rebates.…”