2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left prefrontal cortex activation during sentence comprehension covaries with grammatical knowledge in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that 6yo children were capable of interpreting transitive object-initial sentences quite well using case marking cues, and their behavioral performance (subject-initial: 99.6%, object-initial: 71.7%) was consistent with findings by Knoll et al (2012) who found similar accuracy rates (subject-initial: M=94.1%; object-initial: M=70.6%; age range: 4.8–6.8 years). Overall the group of 3yo children performed on average less accurately than the 6yo children, but their performance was above chance level for subject-initial (76.8%) and for object-initial (62.5%) sentences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results indicate that 6yo children were capable of interpreting transitive object-initial sentences quite well using case marking cues, and their behavioral performance (subject-initial: 99.6%, object-initial: 71.7%) was consistent with findings by Knoll et al (2012) who found similar accuracy rates (subject-initial: M=94.1%; object-initial: M=70.6%; age range: 4.8–6.8 years). Overall the group of 3yo children performed on average less accurately than the 6yo children, but their performance was above chance level for subject-initial (76.8%) and for object-initial (62.5%) sentences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While previous studies mainly focused on the functional localization of brain regions involved in syntactic processing or the structural changes accompanying behavioral changes (Brauer and Friederici, 2007, Knoll et al, 2012, Nunez et al, 2011), our study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to show differences in the functional interplay of the language network in young children processing syntactic structures. Both 6yo and 3yo children showed a main effect of WORDORDER in the left pSTG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is generally accepted that such developmental differences are related to linguistic experiences, as well as to neural maturational processes (Garcia-Sierra, Rivera-Gaxiola, Percaccio, Conboy, Romo, Klarman, Ortiz & Kuhl, 2011; Werker & Hensch, 2015); however, the precise nature of these dynamics is still not well understood. The present study examines the degree to which neural specialization for language, characterized by increasingly focal left-lateralized activation as monolinguals (e.g., Knoll, Obleser, Schipke, Friederici & Brauer, 2012), functions similarly in early Spanish–English bilinguals, and across both of their languages when receiving early and systematic dual-language exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developmental perspective addresses how the neurobiological system supporting language learning develops towards a mature human adult form12345678. The evolutionary view clarifies which aspects of the neurobiology of human communication can be related to those present in our primate evolutionary relatives91011, which also determines the aspects that can be realistically modelled at the neuronal level in primate neurobiological models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%