Left to their fate: rights of minority equity holders in Ghanaian firms

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the rights of shareholders, particularly those of minority shareholders in the management of firms in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach – As a result of the largely unexplored nature of this issue in Ghana, a qualitative analysis was conducted to offer a painstaking understanding needed. The case study design is in particular relevant for exploring such phenomenon, as it evolves through the experiences of several key players. Findings – Data indicate that minority shareholders’ influence is, in most cases, nil in every aspect of their firms. Whilst majority shareholders have an absolute right to appoint or influence the appointment of top officials of the firms, minority shareholders’ role in the selection is limited. In addition, in regards to control of corporate decision-making processes, unlike the majority shareholders, the minority shareholders do not have any influence on them. Further, in terms of relevant information, whilst the majority shareholders have absolute access to them anytime they desire, the minority shareholders only rely on annual general meetings to get hold of them, thus limiting their access to corporate information. The revelations unambiguously grant the majority shareholders of the firms absolute control rights whilst undermining the rights of the minority shareholders. This paper was concluded by itemizing the implications of our findings for management, regulators and governments. Originality/value – It is believed that this is among the handful of studies that have been conducted using developing or emergent economy data to empirically analyse how minority shareholders wield their rights in emergent economies and to add to the mounting pool of scattered cross-country evidence.

Corporate Social Responsibility: Institutional Behavior Differences in Extractive Industry

“…Second, our research is predominantly significant given that 'Africa is turning into the new Asia' [29] and is drawing expanded study with respect to both business operations and CSR [30][31][32][33]. We along these lines spawn discoveries on a CSR prominent, high despair connection of enthusiasm to a scope of researchers [34][35][36][37] and start to form a hypothesis based on comprehension of the nature and ramifications of CSR in the sub-Saharan African institutional environment.…”

Peran Kepemilikan Saham Mayoritas dan Strategi Perusahaan terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan (Studi Perusahaan Telekomunikasi Nirkabel)

“…Dari penjelasan tersebut, dapat dijabarkan pemegang saham pengendali yang memiliki saham makaa sebanding dengan jumlah yang dimiliki dan mempengaruhi jalannya usaha disebut kepemilikan saham mayoritas. Rasio kepemilikan saham pada jumlah total saham yang beredar dapat digunakan untuk mengukur kepemilikan ini (International Finance Corporation, 2018;Croci et al, 2016;Agyemang et al, 2015;Komite Nasional Kebijakan Tata Kelola, 2006).…”

Foreign investors? The effects of the property structure and legal system as mechanisms of corporate governance in Brazilian regulated companies

“…An important examination of agency conflict in developing countries is the unresolved conflicts between majority shareholders and minority shareholders (McLean et al, 2012). Corporate governance scholars have argued that when the legal system of an economy is weak in terms of protecting minority shareholders from expropriation, corporate governance mechanisms can offer higher levels protection (Agyemang et al, 2015). Increasingly, Since 1992, there is being increasing evidences that those economies which seek to attract foreign direct investment, but are characterized by a weak protection of the interests of minority shareholders tend to develop a higher number of codes of good governance (Aguilera and Cuervo-Cazurra, 2004).…”