2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12029-0_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left Ventricle Full Quantification Using Deep Layer Aggregation Based Multitask Relationship Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From our knowledge, the proposed method achieved the best results for the eight LV parameters (Acav, Amyo, IS, I, IL, AL, A, AS) and similar results for three parameters (dim1, dim2, and dim3) when compared to the state-of-the-art methods [8], [9], [19]. Overall, it exhibited a higher correlation and lower prediction errors for all parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From our knowledge, the proposed method achieved the best results for the eight LV parameters (Acav, Amyo, IS, I, IL, AL, A, AS) and similar results for three parameters (dim1, dim2, and dim3) when compared to the state-of-the-art methods [8], [9], [19]. Overall, it exhibited a higher correlation and lower prediction errors for all parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The DenseNets training took 1 hour and regression inference 8 seconds for all parameters. Table I shows the dice index of the method (the average of five folds and the best fold) for epicardium and endocardium and the results from the best competitors of LVQuan18: Xue et al [8] (reference provided by LVQuan2019), Li et al (1 st place) [9], Kerfoot et al [20] (2 nd place) and Guo et al (3 rd place) [19] .. Xue et al [8], and Li et al [9] methods do not have a segmentation step, thus no comparison is possible for this step of our method. Table II presents the regression results for the 11 parameters, with values of MAE and correlation coefficient (ρ) for both the average of five folds and the best folds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, an automatic segmentation method for this task is desirable in clinical setups. Currently, a majority of studies for the automatic cardiac segmentation are based on the cine CMR sequence [3][4][5][6][7][8], since the cine CMR sequence has the ability to capture the cardiac motions during the whole cardiac cycle and can present clear boundary [1]. The LGE CMR sequence enhances the representation of the infarcted myocardium and is routinely used in the clinical diagnosis of MI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%