1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-010x(19970501)278:1<9::aid-jez2>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left vs. right-hemisphere regulation of aggressive behaviors inAnolis carolinensis: Effects of eye-patching and fluoxetine administration

Abstract: Two experiments examined aggressive responding in Anolis carolinensis. In experiment one, ten adult male anoles had either their left (LEP) or right (REP) eye patched and were then subjected to ten behavioral trials during which a second male was introduced into the cage. Greater numbers of headbobs, or bites, were observed during the LEP condition, while greater numbers of dewlaps and head bobs were observed during the REP condition. In addition, while baseline skin color showed no difference between groups, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As central and plasma monoaminergic activity, influence behavior, eyespot coloration, and social status [16,33,35,[37][38][39][40][41]71,73]we also measured changes in neurotransmitter and hormonal activity following a second social interaction. For example, during aggressive encounters, temporally and anatomically specific activation and reuptake of 5-HT is highly correlated with eyespot celerity, aggression and social status [8][9][10][11]41,68,69,71,73,75,76].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…As central and plasma monoaminergic activity, influence behavior, eyespot coloration, and social status [16,33,35,[37][38][39][40][41]71,73]we also measured changes in neurotransmitter and hormonal activity following a second social interaction. For example, during aggressive encounters, temporally and anatomically specific activation and reuptake of 5-HT is highly correlated with eyespot celerity, aggression and social status [8][9][10][11]41,68,69,71,73,75,76].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, when the right eye is leading, it acts in a more vigilant manner, spending more time looking in directions other than the threat. Similar differences in eye function have been described for other vertebrates including fishes (Bisazza et al 1997a, b;De Santi et al 2001;Bisazza and de Santi 2003), anurans Robins and Rogers 2006a, b), reptiles (Deckel and Jevitts 1997;Hews and Worthington 2000) and birds (Rogers 2000;Vallortigara et al 2001). An important difference is that in the examples cited above, the animal was exposed to different stimuli (e.g., threat, food or a conspecific), while in the present experiments the differences in eye visuo-motor patterns were obtained by comparing the activity patterns of each eye when exposed to the same stimulus (i.e., threat), with only spatial attributes changed (approach direction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winberg et al (2001) reported that dietary supplementation with TRP for 7 days also results in an inhibition of aggressive behaviour in rainbow trout, whereas 3 days of TRP supplementation have no effect on aggressive behaviour. An anti-aggressive effect of the brain 5-HT system has been reported in a number of vertebrates (Raleigh et al, 1991;Blanchard et al, 1991Blanchard et al, , 1993Deckel, 1996;Deckel and Jevitts, 1997;Edwards and Kravitz, 1997;Larson and Summers, 2001) including teleost fish (Adams et al, 1996;Winberg and Nilsson, 1993), and the suppression of aggressive behaviour induced by elevated dietary TRP is believed to be mediated by elevated brain 5-HT activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%