1982
DOI: 10.1038/297458a0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leg 84 of the Deep Sea Drilling Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using values obtained by Davis et al [1983] for Taiwan (m b = 0.85, m = 1.03) and the geometry of the wedges as determined by other workers and listed above include: Himalaya l = 0.76, Java Trench south of Bali l = 0.7, Makran wedge in the Gulf of Oman l = 0.98, Peru Trench l = 0.6, Guatemala l = 0.7, Oregon l = 0.9, and eastern Aleutians in the Gulf of Alaska l = 0.88. Their calculated pore fluid pressures are in agreement with the observed values for wedges where observations are available: Makran l = ∼1 (as noted by Davis et al [1983]), Guatemala l = "high" [Aubouin et al, 1982], Oregon l = 0.85 [Moore and von Huene, 1980], and Aleutians l = ∼0.87 [Hottman et al, 1979]. Generally, the predicted pore fluid pressure ratios are well in excess of hydrostatic (l^0.33) and terrestrial critical taper wedges require m = 1.03, m b = 0.85, and l = 0.68-0.98 [Davis et al, 1983].…”
Section: Approach: Critical Taper Wedge Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Using values obtained by Davis et al [1983] for Taiwan (m b = 0.85, m = 1.03) and the geometry of the wedges as determined by other workers and listed above include: Himalaya l = 0.76, Java Trench south of Bali l = 0.7, Makran wedge in the Gulf of Oman l = 0.98, Peru Trench l = 0.6, Guatemala l = 0.7, Oregon l = 0.9, and eastern Aleutians in the Gulf of Alaska l = 0.88. Their calculated pore fluid pressures are in agreement with the observed values for wedges where observations are available: Makran l = ∼1 (as noted by Davis et al [1983]), Guatemala l = "high" [Aubouin et al, 1982], Oregon l = 0.85 [Moore and von Huene, 1980], and Aleutians l = ∼0.87 [Hottman et al, 1979]. Generally, the predicted pore fluid pressure ratios are well in excess of hydrostatic (l^0.33) and terrestrial critical taper wedges require m = 1.03, m b = 0.85, and l = 0.68-0.98 [Davis et al, 1983].…”
Section: Approach: Critical Taper Wedge Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Parmi les résultats du « retour à la mer », on retiendra : (i) La distinction de différents types de marges actives. L'un des résultats majeurs, qui revient en grande partie à Aubouin, est la mise en évidence de marges actives convergentes en extension sans véritable prisme d'accrétion (Figure 6), en Amérique centrale [Aubouin et al, 1979[Aubouin et al, , 1981[Aubouin et al, , 1982[Aubouin et al, , 1984.…”
Section: Aperçu Sur Le Bilan Scientifique Lié Au « Retour à La Mer »unclassified
“…The regional framework of the Central America Trench off Costa Rica is well known from investigations since DSDP drilling in the early 1980s (Aubouin et al, 1982) and later, Legs 170 and 205 (Kimura, Silver, Blum, et al, 1997;Morris, Villinger, Klaus, et al, 2003). Recently, this margin has been the focus of two major scientific projects: the German Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 574 "Volatiles and fluids in subduction zones" (sfb574.ifm-geomar.de/home/) and the US MARGINS National Science Foundation program (www.nsf-margins.org/SEIZE/CR-N/CostaRica.html).…”
Section: Site Survey Datamentioning
confidence: 99%