2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leg stiffness during running in highly cushioned shoes with a carbon-fiber plate and traditional shoes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to our hypothesis, running in the SUPER did not affect leg stiffness, despite the relatively more compliant midsole foam in the SUPER compared with CON condition. These results are consistent with recent findings from Hata et al (35) that leg stiffness was not different between “super-shoes” (Nike ZoomX Vaporfly NEXT%) and control shoes (MEDIFOAM Melos MF-003) at 20 km·h −1 . The authors suggested that the lower hysteresis of the “super-shoe” midsole foam may assist in increasing leg spring, but the results failed to prove this, and our findings further confirm the unaffected leg stiffness between shoes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Contrary to our hypothesis, running in the SUPER did not affect leg stiffness, despite the relatively more compliant midsole foam in the SUPER compared with CON condition. These results are consistent with recent findings from Hata et al (35) that leg stiffness was not different between “super-shoes” (Nike ZoomX Vaporfly NEXT%) and control shoes (MEDIFOAM Melos MF-003) at 20 km·h −1 . The authors suggested that the lower hysteresis of the “super-shoe” midsole foam may assist in increasing leg spring, but the results failed to prove this, and our findings further confirm the unaffected leg stiffness between shoes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the current study, we found an average increase in step length of ~2 cm in national runners and an increase of ~1 cm in trained runner along with a proportional decrease in step frequency. Previous studies also reported a similar increasing step length (3,4,42) and step frequency decrease (41,42) in shoes with greater LBS compared with traditional shoes in national runners and trained runners (24). Our results show that trained runners, as opposed to national runners, increased contact time 0.01 s during running in shoes with increased LBS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It has been shown that across different runners greater vertical oscillation is related to worse RE (44), so increased vertical oscillation at slow velocity in the national runners could potentially explain this group's failure to improve the RE at slow velocity with shoes with increased LBS. Keeping in mind that the running pattern and running kinematics are a dynamic system with several intercon-nected variables (45), the different energy savings between groups might be due to the combination of many but small biomechanical adaptations (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported similar step frequency decreases (1.3-1.9%) 25,44 and proportional step length increases (1.2-1.4%) 4,43,44 in AFT road shoes compared to traditional running shoes during treadmill running at constant speeds 4,4345 , during track running in AFT road shoes (1.3-2.7%), 29 and recently in AFT spikes (1.9-2.3%). 14 However, the increases in step length we observed here in PEBA+Plate (4.7-6.2%) are substantially larger than those reported before.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%