“…Thinking of Manchukuo and Harbin as relational assemblages might commemorate the 'memory of the nameless' -not only of Chinese, but also of Russians, Koreans and prisoners of war who were killed at Unit 731, or Japanese farmers and workers, or Chinese suspected of 'collaboration' , who died at the hands of locals or Russian 'liberators' in Harbin and other areas after the end of the war. With regard to the latter, Gilly Carr reminds us that 'drawing attention to dark histories is never a comfortable thing' , 81 but a deeper, more nuanced, understanding of circumstances and signifiers could be useful, not least to surviving relatives of the deceased: a new milieu -a new 'new remembering' . 82 A new 'new remembering' of the Japanese occupation of Manchukuo might remind us of the capacity for human violence against others which lurks behind the veneer of civilization.…”