2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legacy and emerging organohalogenated compounds in feathers of Eurasian eagle-owls (Bubo bubo) in Norway: Spatiotemporal variations and associations with dietary proxies (δ13C and δ15N)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In eagle owl, the concentrations were much higher (86% detection frequency, mean 285 ± 124 ng/g wet wt), and little owl was the least impacted species (83% detection frequency, mean 36.2 ± 16 ng/g wet wt). Because of its potential for bioaccumulation and biomagnification through the food web, PFOS is commonly reported in birds of prey (Eriksson et al, 2016; Monclús et al, 2022). Also, PFOS was the main PFAS detected in livers from the top predator common buzzard ( Buteo buteo ) in Belgium, with mean concentrations between 41.8 and 67.1 ng/g wet weight (Groffen et al, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eagle owl, the concentrations were much higher (86% detection frequency, mean 285 ± 124 ng/g wet wt), and little owl was the least impacted species (83% detection frequency, mean 36.2 ± 16 ng/g wet wt). Because of its potential for bioaccumulation and biomagnification through the food web, PFOS is commonly reported in birds of prey (Eriksson et al, 2016; Monclús et al, 2022). Also, PFOS was the main PFAS detected in livers from the top predator common buzzard ( Buteo buteo ) in Belgium, with mean concentrations between 41.8 and 67.1 ng/g wet weight (Groffen et al, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large matrix effects have been reported by the US Department of Agriculture in residue analysis at low spike concentration (with 50–150 % recoveries) which cannot be entirely removed by cleanup procedures (Dana Ayu Mustofa et al, 2022). Unusual recoveries of 200.54 % from hair samples [ 72 ], 15–144 % from owl feathers [ 73 ], 5, 9, 36 % [ 74 ], 172.6, 169.3, 180.9, 140.7, and 167.3 %, which was thought to be mostly caused by the significant variances between the soils [ 75 ], and 69–140, 8.2–41.6 from soil [ 76 ], have been recorded. Several recovery techniques are reported ( Table 1 ), such as procedural blank, spiked blank, spiked sample, and surrogate recovery among others.…”
Section: Results and Discussion: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where more than 50 % of the data concentrations are < MDL, I/2 MDL was used; although 70 % data courage is preferred [ 104 ]. IDLs were taken to be MDL*√2/2 for values whose MDL were not detected [ 232 ], and detection limit (DL) assumed as 4 blanks + 3*SD of the blanks in cases where a blank signal was observed [ 73 ]. A low LOD is preferred since it indicates that the analytical method is sensitive enough to detect small quantities or amounts of the analyte being tested [ 268 ].…”
Section: Results and Discussion: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations